A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
July 09, 2009
Sotomayor – strong insights but ‘anal’
Judge Sonia Sotomayor is definitely up to Supreme Court snuff on constitutional law issues, according to the Brennan Center, but a Washington Post review of the “granular” level of her appellate decision-making finds here a bit anal, for doing and reduplicating trial-court level details. Even that, though, was not found to be necessariliy “bad” by every legal expert interviewed in the Post story.
Labels:
Sotomayor (Sonia)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment