I've long suspected Schultz's prairie progressivism was more schtick than substance. (Kids, that's alliteration in the service of journalism; don't try this at home alone.) Given his previous, pre-Obama tendencies and political leaniongs, there's also been reason to suspect why it's fakery. Ed used to be a wingnut.
Anyway, there's good proof of that.
He's apparently a blank-check defender of Obama's Bush-like views on extensive executive power in foreign affairs, or at least can't stand to see an action of Obama's (in this case, the bin Laden killing) questioned.
He's enough of an asshat to actually call into David Sirota's radio talk show and take Sirota to task for asking the very questions Ed would ask were he a real progressive. Here you go (h/t Salon):
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
Showing posts with label Schultz (Ed). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Schultz (Ed). Show all posts
May 19, 2011
Ed Schultz is an Obamiac asshat
Labels:
Obamiacs,
Schultz (Ed)
October 03, 2010
Ed Schultz gets it half right
Ed Schultz got it half right with his diatribe at the "One Nation" rally in DC. But, not much more than that:
One problem, Ed? NAFTA? WTO, including starting the process of Chinese admission?
Who was president then?
Oh, yeah. Bill Clinton.
Whether or not we are losing more jobs rather than gaining, is besides the point. Plenty of Dems "participated" in the job outsourcing.
And, don't try to "go there" with the financial meltdown.
Who was president when Gramm-Leach-Bliley gutted Glass-Steagall? Oh, yeah. He even pushed for it. What percentage of Congressional Dems supported it? About 50 percent.
Don't go there on the meltdown, today, either.
Which presidential candidate got more Wall Street money in 2008?
Oh, yeah. Obama.
In a fiery speech that opened the "One Nation Working Together" rally on the National Mall, Schultz blamed Republicans for shipping jobs overseas and curtailing freedoms. He borrowed some of conservative commentator Glenn Beck's rhetoric and vowed to "take back our country."
One problem, Ed? NAFTA? WTO, including starting the process of Chinese admission?
Who was president then?
Oh, yeah. Bill Clinton.
Whether or not we are losing more jobs rather than gaining, is besides the point. Plenty of Dems "participated" in the job outsourcing.
And, don't try to "go there" with the financial meltdown.
Who was president when Gramm-Leach-Bliley gutted Glass-Steagall? Oh, yeah. He even pushed for it. What percentage of Congressional Dems supported it? About 50 percent.
Don't go there on the meltdown, today, either.
Which presidential candidate got more Wall Street money in 2008?
Oh, yeah. Obama.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)