SocraticGadfly: American sociology
Showing posts with label American sociology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American sociology. Show all posts

January 24, 2025

Slab City and East Jesus — Civilization and Its Discontents; Freud, Aristotle and more

I tumbled, after getting back from vacation and editing and posting my video of East Jesus, reading Spin's relatively new early 2024 story about East Jesus and Slab City, and grokking other videos (I'm not looking at a full 140 minutes on one video, oy) that what we were talking about was in the second half of this piece's title, specifically yes ....

Freud's book "Civilization and Its Discontents" (Wikipedia), with a summary moderately longer than Wiki here. I understand the discontents. I'm not sure this is the best place or the living here is the best way to address them. I know it wouldn't be for me, whether at my age today, or 20 years younger.

And, beyond personal observations, there's a larger flip side to that, and, I had already posted that to one of those other videos.

It's Hobbes' "Warre of all against all," and when you read about people burning each other out, or one relatively long-time denizen talking in this video about how "some crazies shouldn't mix with others," but neither she nor the videographer offer insight as to which crazies are "better" and which are "worse," especially with no functioning public law, you're at Hobbes.

Like Freud, or maybe like a quasi-Marxian anarchist (don't forget that Marx himself was nowhere near anarchism and hated the likes of Proudhon), I see the discontents. I feel them.

But, I don't want to give up civilization's comforts. Nor its safety and security.

And, per another commenter on that same video, one can abandon, or at least lessen, the desire to "get ahead" and yet live in a life with the physical comforts and amenities of some degree of civilization. Buddhism? Or monastic orders in it or Christianity? Or the various dervish orders of Sufism? Note that in all three of these traditions, it's "orders." Individual ascetics have been frowned on in all three and beyond.

To move from Freud, and Proudhon, and more than 2,000 years earlier? Aristotle was right when he said "Man is a civilizational animal." (That's much better than the old-time common translation of "Man is a political animal." It's more informative than "Man is an urban animal," or even "Man is a civic animal," which gets close to the πόλις in Greek behind the πολιτικὸν, translated by Latin by "civis." It's also more accurate, or definitely more informative, than "Man is a social animal." In all cases I'm using that first word for "humanity," of course.)

And, that all said. Freud's ideas on the origins of civilization, which presume to involve a social contract type conscious "leap" into being civilized, are themselves problematic. In reality, the development of civilization was incremental,  more organic, and with various swirls and eddies similar to the development of agriculture.

As part of this, I add that Freud probably was not that close to correct on the origins and developmental history of religion. That is a complex field, and some metaphysical aspects of what developed into "religion" surely arose long before modern civilization did.

As for Slab City and East Jesus? A fair chunk of this is NOT freedom when you're addicted. The Kinks got it right:

Paranoia WILL destroy ya, especially when you're strung out on meth.

As for those who aren't tweakers? More power to you ... if you want to live off solar panels for A/C and either spend bigly on bottled water or else ration yourself and filter irrigation canal runoff while avoiding the eyes of the Imperial Irrigation District, and in either case, per some videos, using some sort of runoff water for bathing.

In addition, whether its agrichemicals or something else, the respiratory infections along the Salton Sea, especially at its southeast corner, don't help things.

May 17, 2013

"Fake" African-American names and assimilation

There's been a number of studies recently about how people with "obvious" African-American first names have more trouble getting hired and related issues. (You can do teh Google, but I'm sure you've read about at least one of these.)

That said, while having some degree of sympathy for, say, a 21-year-old kid who doesn't have money to legally change his or her name, I don't have total sympathy with the idea that HR folks, or general management in a company not big enough to have a separate HR department, should turn a totally blind eye to the name.

It's one thing, in my opinion, if the person has a traditional African first name, especially if it's also attached to a traditional African surname. That said, I'm venturing that said family's next generation will have kids with more WASP-ish first names, or at least, WASP-ish nicknames playing off African first names.

What I am talking about is African-Americans whose families have been in America since pre-Civil War days,  who have Anglo-Saxon type surnames, but who, today, invent fake African-sounding names for their kids.

You know what I'm talking about. "Shaniqua" or similar.

Speaking of teh Google, if you want to find a traditional African name, that's one thing. But, to make up something like that? I'll be honest, I know that on a subconscious level I couldn't ignore that, and maybe not on a conscious level.

Many people may say, "What about Hispanics"?

Ahh, usually, they do just what I mentioned earlier. By the third generation, if not the second, if they don't have WASP-ish first names, they do for either nicknames or shortened forms of their names. "Manuel" becomes "Manny." "Roberto" becomes "Bob."

And, it happens in other countries, with other ethnicities. I think of two tinhorn authoritarian jefes in South America, Alfredo Stroessner of Paraguay and German heritage, and Alberto Fujimori of Peru and Japanes heritage. Stroessner didn't have the first name of Hans-Werner and Fujimori didn't have the first name of Takugawa.

So, sorry for the Shaniquas of the U.S. Sorry that your parents are often putting you behind an 8-ball in a country that's already got growing socioeconomic divisions.

But, per the examples above, maybe if you use a nickname, go by your middle name on a resume or whatever, you can partially get out from behind that 8-ball.

October 08, 2010

Scoop Jackson, playing the race card again?

ESPN's resident raceologist claims that reaction to Brett Favre's repeated retirement dances has been nothing compared to fan reaction to LeBron James' "Decision."

Bull. Scoop occasionally has good things to opine, but, more and more, he seems to be playing a character with a shtick. Jason Whitlock has smacked him down far better than I could, but has probably gotten tired of it.

Fact is, Favre never strung Green Bay out the way James did Cleveland. The full-blown retirement dances only came later. Ditto on undercutting coaches.

Is there no racism involved with white reaction to James? Of course not. And, someone like Whitlock would say the same. But, is it the primary driver? No.

As for blacks rallying around James, that's another issue, and arguably a problem itself. Scoop, if you want to move above the dime-store level of sociology of racial issues, try tackling that.

Beyond that, if you'll pardon the pun, race issues in general aren't always black and white; they're certainly not in this case.

August 20, 2010

Dear U.S. Muslims: welcome to the world of atheism

While the numbers from Time's poll on what Muslims should and should not do/serve/run for in politics are sad, they're still higher than the latest similar polls I've seen about atheists.

Remember, we're more disliked and distrusted politically than even gays and lesbians.