A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
Showing posts with label parenting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parenting. Show all posts
May 21, 2010
Mom's touch is worth something
It can help prevent adult inflammatory-related illnesses. And, not all of those are "physical"; major depression may, in part, have an inflammatory cause.
September 19, 2009
Conditional-love parenting doesn’t work, Dr. Phil
Showing Dr. Phil and others, who oppose Carl Rogers’ ideas, quite wrong, studies show that conditional-love parenting produces, in essence, conditional self-esteem in children.
I think there’s a lot to this story.
This ties directly to some of the work of Nathaniel Branden, father of the self-esteem movement. (The movement behind things like Character Counts, ultimately, and NOT the father of the false self-esteem movement of never confronting a child and giving everybody in class an A.)
This should also have implications for teachers, especially in younger grades.
And, to the degree support on the job, etc., can be more unconditional vs. less unconditional, I daresay it has connections to management, etc.
I think there’s a lot to this story.
This ties directly to some of the work of Nathaniel Branden, father of the self-esteem movement. (The movement behind things like Character Counts, ultimately, and NOT the father of the false self-esteem movement of never confronting a child and giving everybody in class an A.)
This should also have implications for teachers, especially in younger grades.
And, to the degree support on the job, etc., can be more unconditional vs. less unconditional, I daresay it has connections to management, etc.
January 06, 2007
Reason No. 932 I’m glad I’m not a parent in today’s world
Can you imagine trying to track, let alone clamp down on or prevent, your child’s online spending? The traditional allowance sounds so quaint.
IMO, what’s really the problem is too-permissive parents. Stop letting children under a certain age on an Internet-accessing computer, period.
IMO, what’s really the problem is too-permissive parents. Stop letting children under a certain age on an Internet-accessing computer, period.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)