SocraticGadfly: Collins (Gail)
Showing posts with label Collins (Gail). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Collins (Gail). Show all posts

December 02, 2010

David Brooks, Gail Collins, defend the MSM against WikiLeaks

Or, at least, that's what they claims to be doing, in one of their "Crossfire" type situations. The inanity that follows is, of course, nothing new from Brooks.

I expected better from Collins, though, based on some of her columns. Sadly, I'll have to revise my rating of her.

Anyway, both fail.

Samples:
Gail Collins: The worst president we ever had was maybe Warren Harding, who had sex with his mistress in the Oval Office coat closet. You’re right, it doesn’t really make the grade.

Wrong. Buchanon, Andrew Johnson and George W. Bush were all worse. And, if sex with mistresses is the standard, then Jack Kennedy is far, far worse than Harding.
David Brooks: I fervently believe that and find myself repulsed by the folks at WikiLeaks. They are bad for the world because they destroy trust, which isn’t in great supply to start with, and I wish the establishment still had enough self-confidence to marginalize this sort of behavior and protect the social ecology.

Well, that's why many of us are repulsed by you.

Meanwhile, has Collins actually read any of the cables?
Gail Collins: Yes, so far I’ve been amazed by how few surprises we’ve gotten.

John Kerry pushing Israel to give away Golan is one of several huge surprises. So is China being OK with a reunified Korea. And, many more.

February 18, 2010

Nullification — and other — nutbarrery rising again

That's just one of the fruits (rotten apples) of Tea Partiers infiltrating the Conservative Political Action Conference, Gail Collins tells us.
It’s civil war déjà vu. The trick in conservative circles today is to see how furious you can get about Washington’s encroachment onto states rights without quite falling over the edge into Fort Sumter.

That said, there's no Bill Buckley to swat down these-neo John Birchers and keep them, per Collins' header, from taking the conservative movement back to 1854. Indeed, the majority of the staff at the magazine Buckley founded embrace the majority of Tea Partiers' nuttery.

Far more scary, beyond this, is Tea Partiers' connection to more nefarious segments beyond the "normal conservative" pale, including actual John Birchers, the militia movement, and more.

Reap the whirlwind, coming just around the corner, for the Republican Party, as well as for more traditional conservative magazines such as Buckley's National Review, for encouraging such folks.

Look here, at Texas. If Debra Medina can force the GOP gubernatorial primary into a runoff, will she demand pledges or promises from Rick Perry before offering her support? Or will she not offer it at all? Will she even run as an independent in the general election? (One could only hope, with that guaranteeing a Bill White win.

Beyond that, though, we have even worse. Whether Medina is a full-blown 9/11 Truther or just playing at the margins, she exemplifies the ready willingness of Tea Partiers to accept any sort of conspiracy thinking, like the idea that the feds are gathering all our medical records.

That said, the nuttery doesn't stop there. Because, it's state capitals, not just Washington, D.C., that are suspect to some Tea Partiers, like Richard Mack, big into Posse Comitatus-type movements who find the locus of power in the county sheriff.

With people like that, it's not just the national GOP, but governors like Rick Perry who run the risk of reaping the whirlwind. That said, why isn't Medina hammering "Governor 40 Percent" harder with the Trans Texas Corridor?

Finally, let's not forget that many Tea Party groups at least skirt with, or even holds hands with, racists and white supremacists. And, yes, Tea Party leaders of all the different groups each have the onus on themselves to disavow that.

July 13, 2009

NYT Sotomayor editorial chock full of legal idiots

Dear Gail Collins: Who within the New York Times op-ed staff had the dim-bulb idea of including Michael Chertoff and Alberto Gonzales in a mock questionnaire for Sonia Sotomayor?

Rather than this being a sign of Holder’s independence, you have to wonder if this was discussed in detail with the Obama White House.

July 04, 2009

Gail Collins snarks on Palin

NYTimes editorial editor wishes for a pants-down scandal, not the open-wallet one we may get, and regrets SP will inflict herself more on Lower 48 now. Just go read it.

October 12, 2008

Gail Collins gives GOP election nonsense a royal smackdown

Can we just clone Collins and have the NYT replace MoJo Dowd with the second Collins?

Starting with comparing John McCain to Gollum through pining for Mitt Romney to wondering about “the real Sarah Palin,” it’s a string of hits.