Via Nick Estes, I didn’t know he died about 5-6 weeks ago. Nick writes about one thing, ultimately, the NYT’s obit and its whitewashing of Churchill being a pretendian.
He was.
Counterpunch had a member of his defense team from his wrongful dismissal suit against the University of Colorado do his obit there. No mention of “Pretendian,” just the suit. Managing editor Joshua Frank republished a 2014 piece with no mention of “Pretendian” in the update header and no asking him about it in the original interview of Churchill, even though it was pretty well known by then.
As for that suit? Yeah, the university was wrong, and may have perjured itself too.
My focus is mainly on this issue.
I’ve said before at Blogger and in comments on Substack that American Indians are not Rousselian noble savages and were not such, nor, if you don’t like the philosophy term that way, “Rousselian nobles,” before 1492, or even circa 1000 CE with Norse contact. My piece there and comment here, is mainly about American Indians and environmentalism, legend vs reality.
But, back to the main.
First, it’s long been known to other Whites besides me. High Country News wrote about it in 2019 before they went down the Rousseau road during COVID. Beyond the likes of HCN, non-skeptical leftist environmentalists like Wrong Kind of Green, have done the same.
Second, Gary Kamiya, way back in 2009, fired a blunderbuss. He indirectly tackled the Pretendian angle, noting that the Rocky Mountain News had covered it even further, but also took on the Rousselian noble savage angle in ways far beyond me, and did so both in Churchill’s own allegedly historical work and beyond. He also had a potshot five years into the future for Frank, who claimed Churchill was being picked on by librulz as well as conservatives. Actually, Churchill played tribalist librulz like a violin. And even academics, or maybe I should say especially academics, liked being played, and like those at Reddit’s r/AskHistorians, reverberated Churchillian notes.
Per Kamiya, Churchill repeated the BS passed along by librulz, some non-skeptical leftists, and yes, some actual American Indians.
By overreaching, Churchill did damage to his field — and that is the thing that is hard to forgive. … The ultimate lesson of the Churchill case is that no cause, however just, benefits from being taken up by a propagandist.
That’s true, period.
Beyond Kamiya, to wrap it up with a bow? Being a capitalist propagandist while pretending you’re not — which is usually the Pretendian bottom line — does even more damage.
