Here's a look at some of my most popular posts with readers the past month — whether they were written last month or not.
Topping the list?
My old deceased frenemy of sorts, Actual Flatticus, and my massive overview of Flatty's political life history on Twitter and elsewhere.
Second, my blogging about the Dallas Morning Snooze / Belo taking a bath on the sale of the Belo building, below what Belo said it would expect to get a year ago, and far below what it got on an initial spec bid based on anticipating Amazon's second HQ coming to Big D. Always fun to kick the Snooze in the nads. There's more Snooze-kicking throughout my blog; just click the labels on that piece.
Third, Texas Greens getting an apparent ballot access win from the Lege, as we await Gov. Strangeabbott's hoped-for signature.
Fourth was Rod Rosenstein blasting James Comey into bits.
Fifth was me blasting Ted Rall into bits, which is getting closer and closer to Snooze-blasting levels of fun.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
Showing posts with label Belo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Belo. Show all posts
June 07, 2019
Top blogging in May
Labels:
#ActualFlatticus,
Belo,
Belo blows,
Comey (James),
Dallas Morning News,
Rall (Ted),
Texas Greens
October 31, 2006
News circulation cratering, despite Belo’s spin
Belo reports that the circulation at the News is off about 13 percent for daily and 12 percent for Sunday, as compared to six months ago, as noted in a
company press release.
Of course, the News’ own reporting on this, as part of circ numbers at major newspapers around the country, “massages” the message.
OK, let’s take Belo’s estimates at face value. That still leaves a 6 percent drop on daily and 4 percent on Sunday circ numbers.
Yes, other major dailies continue to drop, but not at that rate. The Los Angeles Times, which is cratering in part due to corporate-imposed staff-whacking as serious as anything Belo has done here, is the only big-sized daily to have a greater rate of circulation decline.
The story then goes on to spin towards Bob Mong and Bob Dechard’s Net-oriented vision for the future:
Strange, though. Belo doesn’t release numbers for those sites, or say how much it has grown over the survey time period. Maybe there’s nothing to massage there.
(Cross-posted on BeloBlog)
company press release.
Of course, the News’ own reporting on this, as part of circ numbers at major newspapers around the country, “massages” the message.
The company attributed the steep drop in part to two deliberate policy changes, which account for about seven points of the daily decline and eight points on Sunday. On April 1, it ceased including third-party barter circulation in reported figures. It also ceased distributing to areas approximately 200 miles or more outside the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
OK, let’s take Belo’s estimates at face value. That still leaves a 6 percent drop on daily and 4 percent on Sunday circ numbers.
Yes, other major dailies continue to drop, but not at that rate. The Los Angeles Times, which is cratering in part due to corporate-imposed staff-whacking as serious as anything Belo has done here, is the only big-sized daily to have a greater rate of circulation decline.
The story then goes on to spin towards Bob Mong and Bob Dechard’s Net-oriented vision for the future:
Newspaper owners have bolstered their Web sites to attract online readers and advertisers, helping to make up for the loss of readers, the association said. It said newspaper Web sites serving the 100 largest markets reported an average 8 percent growth in their online audiences.
Strange, though. Belo doesn’t release numbers for those sites, or say how much it has grown over the survey time period. Maybe there’s nothing to massage there.
(Cross-posted on BeloBlog)
Labels:
Belo,
Dallas Morning News
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)