SocraticGadfly: 2026 elections
Showing posts with label 2026 elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2026 elections. Show all posts

September 16, 2026

Proof Sarah Eckhardt is a squish on BDS in the Texas Comptroller's race

I've already said this about the Comptroller's race, where the Austin-area state senator is the Democratic candidate vs interim Dreamy Don Huffines, that compared to Green Party candidate ???, Eckhardt is a squish on the issue of pledging the state to stop being anti-BDS on its investments.

ConservaDem Charles Kuffner recently interviewed her, and it may be in part that Kuff, himself being very much a squish on BDS or anything anti-Zionist, didn't ask her, but in the Word document transcript of the interview, neither "BDS" nor "boycott" is there. Kuff even says in one question that the comptroller's office has gotten in trouble at times in the past for "policymaking." Perfect place to ask about BDS, right?

Shehla Faizi has already adamantly pledged to trash that shit, as I noted back in March, as the Green candidate. I also noted back then Eckhardt being a squish. I don't know the position of Libertarian V. Alonzo Echavarria-Garza. For places like Community Impact and other media sites, he's refused to answer questionnaires. Maybe he's afraid the city of Hearne will fire him as city manager.

September 08, 2026

All Things Paxton as 2026 elections hit their post-Labor Day finish line

I see what I did there, NPR.

With Big John Cornyn refusing to help Kenny Boy Paxton in his fundraising get at all, as announced last month, The Eyes of Texas, certainly MAGAts Republican eyes, turned to The Donald.

And Trump's PAC has now shoved $10 million in the Paxton ad buy offering plate, the Trib reports. That said, its subhed gets a framing issue wrong. For Trump, this is ultimately not about this race now being an unexpected key to which duopoly party controls the Senate. Rather, it's about his (hedged) backing of Paxton over Cornyn through the GOP primary and runoff. It's personal. 

That said, the content of the ad buy looks un-Trumpian bland and impersonal. Attacking Talarico over taxes rather than past statements of his like "god is nonbinary"? WTF?

At the Monthly, Dan Solomon snarks on the Trump official endorsement that accompanied the ad buy. 

Elmo just dropped a quarter-mil. Chump change for him, and chump change for what Kenny Boy actually needs. 

Meanwhile, Kenny Boy appears to have violated U.S. Senate Ethics Committee wealth and assets disclosure rules. Shock me. Nothing will happen until after the election, if anything happens then. Before the election, the SEC won't even send an official warning letter.

This one deserves an extended pull quote to show how bad it is:

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appears to have violated federal ethics law in significant ways when filing recent disclosures of his assets and liabilities, creating confusion about his net worth and holdings, a review by ProPublica and The Texas Tribune found. 
Among them: Paxton, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, reported owning seven homes but said he earned no income from any. Yet all but one was listed for rent during the reporting periods, and some current residents and neighbors at those addresses confirmed that the properties were rented, the news organizations found. Receiving income and not reporting it is a violation of federal disclosure law, three ethics experts said. 
Additionally, Paxton did not disclose mortgages for three condos at a Utah golf resort that federal law requires him to list as liabilities if they are not personal residences. 
He also valued his stake in a vacant plot of Texas land at up to $50,000 on last year’s filing, but his business partner told the newsrooms Paxton’s share for years has been worth about $1 million. Federal financial disclosure law requires property to be listed at fair market value. 
The apparent errors and omissions the newsrooms found obscure the extent of Paxton’s income streams, assets and debt, making it difficult for voters to make sense of his finances as they mull whether to support him in November’s election, the ethics experts said.

Shocked? Not me. And I'm certain it's deliberate, not sloppiness, regarding the next paragraph after the pull quote.

It's also stupid, whether stupidity born of sloppiness or of arrogance, because it triggered this story. Yes, as the story notes, if he wins, it makes it harder to track Senate conflicts of interest. But first, he has to win. 

But, per the end of the story, here's how you know he's off the hook, other than for stupidity:

The ethics committee did not respond to requests for comment. Candidates or senators who willingly falsify financial disclosures can be fined up to $50,000 or prosecuted for making a false statement to the government, a felony. The committee rarely investigates senators and has not formally sanctioned a member in 19 years.

Bingo. The Senate, contra the House, maintains this level of false collegiality.

==

US Senate Majority Leader John Thune's Super PAC is finally dropping some money for Kenny Boy Paxton. 

September 02, 2026

Let's hold on here on Clayton Tucker for Ag Commish

When I first read his bio, per his website, I thought, good stuff. Being secretary of the Texas Farmers Union, part of the National Farmers Union, and much better than Texas/American Farm Bureau Federation and not on the take for Big Ag, was a key note. Opposition to data centers is of course good.

That said, his small business? Grassroots Nation is a spin off Netroots Nation, in part, though it also has nonpolitical clients. 

And, on the issues? On water, does he think Proposition 4 was a good deal or not? It wasn't.

Glyphosate? The problem is Roundup Ready crops create Roundup Resistant weeds. The cancer angle is still overstated, I think.

Health care? He supports better access, but I see nothing about single-payer, or even pushing the Lege to opt into Obamacare Medicaid expansion.

Climate change? I see climate-smart farming practices. His family raises goats. Where's he stand on cows and cow farts?

Or, where's he stand on Big Oil, since wingnut Rethuglican Nate Sheets says he wants to cover all farmland with renewable energy?

Well, Nate links to Clayton's financial disclosures.

It's under 100 shares in both cases, but Devon Energy, and even more, Energy Transfer, isn't so good a sign. Vitesse Energy bills itself as a non-owner investor in oil and gas wells. Three strikes, you're out on climate change.

UPDATE: An Energy Transfer gas-processing site in Shreveport, Louisiana is listed as the largest methane super-emitter in the country

And, I'm one of those environmental leftists who opposes expanding nuclear power without a LOT more safeguards, contra the likes of James Hansen. So, owning stock in a uranium company is also not good. 

This isn't a "gotcha" the way Nate thinks, but it is problematic. 

So, let's not stop there.

Three JP Morgan funds. One private equity fund if not more. Multiple real estate investment trusts. Invesco, which is listed as an ethically responsible investor.

Royalty Pharma is not Big Pharma, but is a bit tangential.  

And, this isn't because he's left hand of the duopoly.

Two years ago, I called out Jill Stein for being an investments hypocrite. (Yashar Ali and Hillz screwed the pooch on that in 2016 by forgetting about early voting.) In 2000, I undervoted rather than vote Ralph Nader, for similar reasons. 

Also, while all of these are less than 100 shares, we're talking more than 40 different holdings. For someone who's just 35, he's doing pretty well.

Let's say 40 investments, 50 shares each. That's 2,000 shares. Let's say $6 per share per year. 

He's got $12,000 per year in investment income. 

September 01, 2026

Texas Progressives talk elections and suits

Off the Kuff analyzes the two most recent polls of the Senate race.

Strangeabbott's "pause" (not "halt," and the Trib correctly uses the first word) on state grants for Flock cameras appears to be about as much of an election-driven stunt as does his "vaunted" audit of data centers for electricity needs. (My county's sheriff has one such grant, and he gets ever more defensive about it, and engages in ever more obfuscation, talking about the protections his office has without ever mentioning Flock other than admitting it's Flock cameras.) 

Joe Joplin still hasn't forgotten about Kenny Boy Paxton stealing his Montblanc pen. And yes, "stealing" is the right word; Joplin said he considered filing charges.  

Former Alamo Trust CEO Kate Rogers had her suit against Patrick and Land Commish Lindsay Dawn Buckingham OKed to proceed

Also in the legal world, Talafreako wants to see Paxton's depositions from his securities fraud case. 

Jon Ossoff — 2028 Democratic presidential candidate

How WILL the "Farm Belt" vote? 

"No money for you!" Big John Cornyn tells Kenny Boy Paxton. 

Contra new Comptroller Don Huffines' politicized claims, Texas schools and cities are hurting for money. The Observer keeps its head up the ass of the left hand of the duopoly on this race, though, and doesn't name Green Shehla Faizi. 

Can MAGA Moms win the gov's office for Gina Hinojosa? The Observer weighs in. (Calling out Strangeabbott on Flock cameras is a nice sidebar to the focus on public schools.) That said, I still think it's Abbott's race to lose, and even though he's a fucktard with fingers in the edges of the cookie jar of corruption, he's not an openly corrupt fucktard, unlike Kenny Boy Paxton. 

 

 

August 26, 2026

More Talafreako the hypocritico

Building on its revelation a week ago that James Talarico seems to be a hypocrite in his stance on pastors endorsing political candidates from their pulpits, written about here by me, we now have a part two from the Texas Monthly.

Ostensibly, the piece is about what they would want to ask both him and Kenny Boy Paxton in a debate, if one happens, but some of the best "issues" are Talafreako's.

He seems two-faced if not outrightly hypocritical on veganism. But, that's minor.

Sexually-affirming care (that's the word, not "gender-affirming," Monthly) for minors who hold themselves as transsexual (that's the word, not the truncated pronoun "trans") is much bigger. 

At a Pride event in 2023—after the Lege passed SB 14, which banned gender-affirming care for minors—he called the bill “the most dangerous” one of the session, and one that “infuriates me.” In early June, though, after clinching the Senate nomination, he appeared on the podcast of Houston lawyer Dan Cogdell, who served as Paxton’s personal attorney for a number of years. During that appearance, Talarico said, “I oppose gender reassignment surgeries for minors.” Then, when asked about his support for the LGBTQ community on Rachel Maddow’s MS NOW show in early August, his tone shifted yet again: “I don’t think we win by selling people out,” he told the host. “We’re refusing to do that in this campaign.”

Yeah, "code switching." Or worse. 

August 21, 2026

Texas Progressives roundup: The back end

Neil Aquino and a few of Kuff's roundup choices didn't fit into either the two big races or into national parks and environmentalism.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project went to a recruitment/organizing meeting of the Space City Marshals. The Marshals do good work to keep Houston protesters safe. Check out the post & read their pitch for support.

Chris Tackett gets into the Tarrant County election site situation, and like other #BlueAnon, ignores that the original cuts were recommended by the county's election official, not by the Commissioners Court. I don't know about the previous races he mentioned, whether it was an actual 3-2 vote, or he's just including the GOP members in a 4-1 or 5-0 bit.

G. Elliott Morris explains why primary polling is so fraught. And, if you've really been following things, doesn't explain much and doesn't talk at all about partisan polling.

The Current talks to music icon Steve Earle, in town to receive that city's Emissary of the Muses award.

The Bloggess experienced some technical difficulties.

August 20, 2026

Texas Progressives talk Strangeabbott, data centers, Talarico, polls, hypocrisy

For the third or fourth week in a row, the annual Texas Progressives roundup got too big and too diffuse in focus to run in one piece. The second half, on environmental and national parks issues, runs this afternoon.

Off the Kuff finds that even Greg Abbott's pollster thinks the Governor's race is close. (Your correspondent thinks Kuffner's reading too much into this. Shock me.)

On the other hand, late last month, Faux News' polling said Strangeabbott was just 1 percentage point ahead. The one normal big asterisk for Tex-ass polling is that it's registered voters, not likely ones; other than that, it looks totally solid.

Side note: It also puts Talafreako 3 points up on Kenny Boy. Will that push Paxton into agreeing to participate in already scheduled debates?

Second side note: Inflation is listed as the No. 1 concern. The border is next, then health, jobs, and political divisions tie for third. "Environment," which would include the water side of data centers, is not listed. "Inflation" right now is driven above all by gas prices, which means Strangeabbott's November future is tied to Trump's stupidity on Iran, which is ultimately in the service of Zionism and Islamophobia, stuff Kuff really doesn't cover much, especially not the former.

Related to the subject matter of the first paragraph, the Trib reports that Strangeabbott plans an electric usage audit of about 300 projects, primarily data centers. That said, another story there notes how specifics-free (shock me) Abbott's "audit" is. It's also unclear how much or how little any of this addresses water as well as electricity.

Regina Vanburg argues that Greg Abbott isn't going to save anyone from data centers.

Also also related? The Observer says its still unclear who will pick up what on the electricity tab cost. 

As for Talafreako? A new round of his hypocrisy has popped up

August 19, 2026

Talafreako hypocritico — now on pulpit endorsements

James Talarico, by late July Fox polling, and other sites, continues to post a small polling edge over Ken Paxton.

Kenny Boy remains much more ethically challenged than Talafreako, but the latter is not simon-pure.

Shock me again, but he's apparently violating his pledge not to accept endorsements from church pulpits. And, though he's not a lawyer, he's doing so in Strangeabbott-type legal-Jesuitical fashion: 

The Sunday before he’d announced his Senate candidacy, he’d gone to his home church of St. Andrew’s Presbyterian, he said, where his pastor, Jim Rigby, had addressed it explicitly. 
“He said, ‘You know, the new IRS rules mean that I can now endorse candidates from this position,’ ” recalled Talarico. “And he said, ‘But I won’t be doing that, because I still believe in the separation of church and state.’ That’s exactly how I feel. I will not seek, nor will I accept, any endorsement from the pulpit anywhere, because that boundary is sacred in my mind.” 
It’s a strong statement—one on which he seems to have compromised. On Sunday morning, at the Luke Church, in Humble, Pastor Timothy Sloan brought Talarico up to the pulpit and made a strong statement of his own. “In the spirit of my pastor, Reverend William Alexander Lawson—he would always say this whenever he had an official that came to the church. He’d say, ‘Now, we don’t endorse candidates. That’s not the church’s role. However, you should know who your pastor endorses and believes in.’ And I want you to know my full, total, and complete weight is behind James Talarico.” Talarico’s team shared the clip across its social media accounts, touting the endorsement of “one of the most respected pastors in Houston.” 
Sloan’s caveat that he is endorsing the candidate in his personal capacity, and not as a representative of the Luke Church, is delivered as a knowing wink—the congregation bubbles up with laughter at his “however.” It’s a technical loophole—not that such things matter anymore, as far as the IRS is concerned—that is pretty well annulled by the fact that it is being delivered from the pulpit on Sunday morning.

Yet more reason to either undervote the race or hope some write-in candidate is entered. And, yet one more thing that Kuff either will ignore or else put in his spin cycle. (The Monthly story was Aug. 11 and as of Aug. 18, Kuff had nothing, so it's on his ignore cycle. I know he reads the Monthly online often enough.)

And, per the next paragraph, Team Talarico immediately put it in their spin cycle:

When I reached out to the team, citing Talarico’s previous denouncement of pulpit endorsements and asking whether his position on the matter had changed, spokesperson JT Ennis pointed to the distinction. “James is honored to have the support of Pastor Sloan, a dedicated and trusted spiritual leader in Houston. As Pastor Sloan made clear, it is not the church’s role to endorse candidates—but that does not preclude faith leaders from speaking out in their personal capacities,” Ennis said in a statement. “As James travels across Texas to engage with places of worship, he will continue speaking beyond political talking points to address the deeper spiritual crisis facing our country.”

Gads. 


 

August 18, 2026

DSAcrats and the Bradley Effect and the Klippenstein Kronicle

It's clear that the the DSA Roseys are self-inflating expectations (while running away from past social media statements). Barring some new piece by Ken Klippenstein, per his most recent one, it seems many fellow travelers, per an old Deep Purple song, think it's not about the kill, but the thrill of the chase.

That seemed true enough after Abdul El-Sayed's much narrower than self-projected win of the Democrat nomination for U.S. Senate in Michigan. It seems more true than ever after Francesca Hong's loss for the Democrat gubernatorial nod in Wisconsin.

And, yes, BlueAnon, leaving off the "-ic" is deliberate, from the left, not the Rethuglican world.

So, why?

Part of it, per CNN, is crappy polling. Mainstream media — and not just print media, but national cable teevee people like, er, CNN — are spending less and less on polls. That means partisan polling rises to the front. Add in the corruption of prediction markets like Kalshi, and partisan polling then feeding back off that to try to create a narrative that may often be almost as fallacious as The Donald claiming he's winning in Iran, and there you go. 

As for Ken claiming "The Rebels Already Won," er, no they didn't, and this comes off in hindsight as flat-out performative spin. Especially with your ongoing refusal by silence to admit even a partial political mea culpa on Graham Platner, you come off looking less and less like a political analyst on Democratic party elections and more and more like the Substack version of a talking head. 

If that's what you want to be, fine. Be honest about it, because if you aren't, I'll keep hanging that label on you. As I read you more and more, I see less and less in the way of actual political analysis in actual electoral races. (For example, Ken in that piece, and notes after the election so far, has said nothing about Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez both refusing to endorse Hong, and why he thinks they didn't.) 

Beyond that, as I noted off this Time piece, per the parentheses in the first paragraph, Hong was looking like a Pander Bear even before Wisconsin primary day. That said, my concerns about that Time piece includes Hong not being quoted, whether the author chose not to reach out, or she chose not to respond, while Crowley was. (I'm assuming lack of reach-out; the author never mentions the old journalistic "We contacted Francesca Hong but she chose not to respond.")

So, Wisconsin didn't even have a rebel running, not in all aspects. 

Speaking of all of the above? Here's a Substack restacking note I had to Ken's Aug. 14 piece about The Third Way ready to label certain Democrats, whether restricted to the DSA or not, as "extremist":

If only Ken recognized that third parties exist, and as part of his talking-head-ism, encouraged more readers to think about that. 
Also, wouldn’t this have been a good chance to ask AOC and Bernie, since he’s using their picture, why they didn’t endorse Hong, and what they think about this new Third Way policy statement, if they know about it?

As is, I think Ken wants the sweet spot of putting talking-headism on top of investigative reporting leaks, but without always getting into actual analysis behind those leaks. 

The Bradley effect? The degree of its effect, and even its existence, have been debated since it was first posulated. And, to the degree it exists, if at all, is it primarily or only about race? This:

While there is widespread belief in a racial component as at least a partial explanation for the polling inaccuracies in the elections in question, it is not universally accepted that this is the primary factor. Peter Brodnitz, a pollster and contributor to the newsletter The Polling Report, worked on the 2006 campaign of black U.S. Senate candidate Harold Ford, Jr., and contrary to Edelman's findings in 1988, Brodnitz indicated that he did not find the race of the interviewer to be a factor in voter responses in pre-election polls. Brodnitz suggested that late-deciding voters tend to have moderate-to-conservative political opinions and that this may account in part for last-minute decision-makers breaking largely away from black candidates, who have generally been more liberal than their white opponents in the elections in question

Offers definite food for thought, as it can apply within primary races as well as general elections. Plus, with much wider use of early voting today, election-day voting, especially outside of senior citizens, still continues to break Republican.

So, if Abdul El-Sayed does lose in Michigan, you heard it here first. (The state has a minimum of nine days of early voting.)

On Hong? Per Ken's interview of her, she won a seven-way primary (presumably for a safe Democrat seat — Wiki confirms with noting it's the east side of the People's Republic of Madison) for the Wisconsin Assembly in 2020, with 28 percent. As for her "consistently leading polls"? Well, per the above, WHOSE polls, first? Ken doesn't say. Second, even if by quality independent pollsters, sure, when other candidates keep dropping out, you might float to the top.

Also per that Wiki page on Hong? Ken doesn't tell you she was a carpetbagger into that district in 2020, first. Second, it discusses those polls, saying her rise only really took off in July — after the Dem straw poll endorsed Sara Rodriguez, then other candidates dropped out, then she dropped out. There was nothing inevitable about her before that.

Third, the bottom portion of her Wiki page confirms what I say above and already said on Shitter: She was turning into a Pander Bear. (Ken didn't tell you that, either, in his interview story. It's true that this only started happening after the date of his interview, but Ken didn't append a note to that piece, do a follow-up or anything else.)

Update, Aug. 19: Angie Nixon's win in the Florida Democratic Senate primary may spin things further. 

August 13, 2026

Texas Progressives talk Paxton and Talarico and call out both halves of the duopoly

As with last week, I've split the weekly roundup into two parts.

Off the Kuff is following the polls in the Senate and other races. 

Related? Outgoing Ag Commish Sid Miller says Republicans will lose statewide races because of Strangeabbott's support for data centers and backlash to that. He thinks Abbott is trying to game the banana republic Texas Lege system to pass out favors within data centers, to boot.

Christofascist Tim Dunn is back in the arena to at least indirectly and in a small way support Ken Paxton financially per what Texas Monthly reports. Farris Wilks remains AWOL.

Kenny Boy failed again in his attempt to force gunz into the State Fair of Texas.

James Talarico, like Paxton, has a voting registration issue. (It makes me wonder if the top tier of non-duopoly candidates nationally has a similar problem anywhere. Dr. Jill Stein, have you always lived where you've claimed?) It makes me not wonder if Kuff will wrote about it, at least with a non-spinning take, because, unless snowballs freeze in hell, I know the answer is no. And, as of the afternoon of Aug. 9, the answer was indeed no. Shock me. The Trib story went up Aug. 5, plenty of time for him to write. 

August 04, 2026

Sam Husseini supposedly "may" run for Congress — I'm "mid" on this

Sam Husseini may run for Congress in Maryland. Sam, as long as you steer away from the conspiracy theory that Zionists whacked Jack, you'll get all the non-monetary support I can give from afar. Go down that road, though, and you're toast with me, and I'll bet with voters as well. 

The "may" is in scare quotes in the header because the Maryland Green Party has already chosen him. What, is Husseini going to pull an Uncle Billy Sherman and decline to run? I just learned that with teh google after already working on this piece, which adds an additional bit of spicyness. 

But, on his website, all he says is "exploratory committee" (which still asking for dinero). Sam, you've been nominated, and as a Green, not part of the duopoly. Intellectual dishonesty, like napalm, is apparently leaving a morning aroma. 

So, let's nuance that support more. I may nuance it completely away by the end.

A couple of years ago, Husseini went beyond legitimate (legitimate in terms of science, not in terms of thought-policing) questions about the Wuhan Institute of Virology to claims about bioweaponization of COVID. Husseini does nuance himself on his Substack by noting a lab leak is not necessarily indicative of lab origin. But, in that same piece, he then goes down the nutter shitpile with:

The attempts to further define away dangerous lab work are even more nefarious when one considers that this entire field is arguably a euphemism for biowarfare.

Uhh, no. First, as I've noted on this issue, China would never allow US scientists access to Wuhan in such a case. Second, like the USSR with its pre-1989 bioweapons research, a Chinese bioweapons lab would be in a place far less populated than Wuhan. That's a serious level of lack of critical thinking.

He continues in that same vein in the next paragraph, using "accidental lab leak" and "biowarfare" in the same sentence.

Two paragraphs later, we go further down conspiratorial rabbit holes:

"Lab leak" implies accident. From the available information, it's possible that the pandemic origins had nothing to do with a lab (less and less likely by the day), it's possible that it accidentally leaked out a lab in Wuhan -- and it's possible that there was intentional release. There are a number of possibilities on the last possibility that I plan on fleshing out in a future piece. The most obvious is that someone was out to frame the Chinese.

Again, no. How could US government agents break into the Wuhan Institute of Virology and leak coronavirus-19? With that question mark, I now place Husseini into the realm of "just asking questions." Hold on to that thought. 

Oh, I'm not alone in wondering. Black Agenda Report, when it was still good, called him out. (This was the just about the top hit when I googled "Sam Husseini" + conspiracy theorist.) It nails the same things I did with this:

Husseini first pulls off this canard by arguing that there is no meaningful difference between biowarfare and biodefense. This is hardly true. Although there is always some overlap between basic science, medicine, preventive research, and warfare, there are also serious differences in emphasis, approach, practice, and funding that he glosses over. Husseini has to assert this tenuous proposition in order to implicate the Wuhan lab in suspected biowarfare malfeasance (or error), and to claim that there is a global biowarfare arms race between China and the US (rather than by the US against its opponents). That linguistic sleight of hand, in particular, the equivalence of biowarfare and biodefense is factually not true, and is certainly not true in one very obvious way regarding the Wuhan lab: if there were a biowarfare arms race happening around the world, the countries putatively at war with each other--the US and China--would not share or allow access to their labs to a competitor state, collaborate, or exchange their research and researchers.

And, the other shoe on that? 

As a point of contrast, no one, not a single Chinese national has ever set foot in Fort Dietrick, the key US biowarfare research lab. No Chinese university has ever collaborated with them. No Chinese funding has been directed to it. No one knows exactly what they are researching.

Yeah, handwaving, conspiracy theory version. 

Also at my second piece, tying to the top link in the third paragraph, he claims Mossad whacked Karen Silkwood. My take is that someone was indeed trying to intimate Silkwood, to the possible point of running her off the road, but not killing her, first, and that said person was working for Kerr-McGee, if anybody, and not Mossad.

He's also kind of clueless with VotePact. 

And, per the "about" page on his Substack, he also thinks the 2014 Ebola outbreak was a lab leak. Here's more that he's written on that. The main problem is that the paper argues from silence. Even if the "official" individual line that bats caused Ebola didn't find infected bats in the relevant area of West Africa doesn't mean that lab leak is the automatic alternative. (His own piece notes that Ebola symptoms are highly variable and West Africans on the ground suggested malaria as an alternative in some cases.) Wiki's long page on the outbreak indicates the "official" framing was never as precise as Husseini portrays it.

Now we get to the nutgraf, 1/3 through his piece on Ebola. That's that it could have been a lab leak from a US lab in Zaire (Democratic Republic of the Congo). Wiki's page addresses that; it notes a 2014 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo showed the viral strain there closely related to previous outbreaks in Central Africa, but the West African outbreak showed no links. 

And, at this point, I don't really feel like even grokking through the other 2/3. Why? Because it's the same level of fucking stupidity as his take on COVID.

Let's add that he has defended Brainworm Bobby against charges of antivaxxerism. Speaking of, here's Brainworm Bobby aping Husseini's line of thought with nutbar claims that Lyme disease and RSV were also created by gain-of-function research. Per the first link in this paragraph and my top link, it also sounds like Husseini was already a JFK conspiracy theorist before latching on to the "zionists did it" angle. This Shitter link of his offers further confirmation. Furthering the nuttery, the person he quote-Shits, Monika Wiesak, apparently believes that JFK Jr was also "whacked" rather than being an underskilled, irrationally overconfident pilot. Otherwise, Monika Wiesak is a total fruitcake herself, and contra her "JFK: Myth vs Reality" the real myth vs reality is guzzling the Camelot Kool-Aid versus knowing the reality of NSAM-263 in Kennedy foreign policy and knowing that in domestic policy the best thing Jack ever did for civil rights was to have Lee Harvey Oswald blow his head off so LBJ could make him into a martyr for the cause.

So, actually, my thought is, best of luck against Glenn Ivey. I do know that Maryland has a fairly strong Green Party to help. But, I won't go out of my way in offering support from afar. And, if you were running against a non-Zionist Democrat, I wouldn't give you the time of day. Even against Ivey, were I in MD-4, I'd have to hold my nose.

My second thought is, once again, contra Noah Berlatsky, who's not really a leftist himself, this shows that horseshoe theory is true and the likes of Husseini illustrate that. 

August 03, 2026

Texas Progressives look at the rest of Merikkka

I split my version of this week's Texas Progressives roundup into two parts. The in-Texas stuff comes later this week.

Democratic insurgents are stepping front and center, as Abdul El-Sayed looks to get the US Senate nod in Michigan (as Elissa Slotkin tries to surf between the lines) and Francesca Hong (recently profiled by Klippenstein) leads the race for Wisconsin's gubernatorial nod, despite incumbent Tony Evers' meddling. It appears lessons from Maine and elsewhere are being learned slowly, if at all. And, to the degree insurgents are staking out antizionist stances, the old guard may not be learning them at all. Ken now has an update piece about both.

Matthew Cole and Max Blumenthal are in various stages of legal battles against the government on its attempts to discover sources on their electronic devices. In Max's case, the problem was instigated by the person I called "Loony Laura Loomer, lying lizard."

Your Local Epidemiologist urges everyone (Republicans) to leave Dr. Fauci alone already. I will, YLE, if he admits his many screwups, which I rounded up in writing about his not-totally-noble original Platonic lie (also calling out his defenders, which include you), a follow-up less noble yet Platonic lie about herd immunity, followed by the set of non-public, totally ignoble, less than Platonic lies exposed by his emails. Kuff, if you're going to include a link like this in your version of the roundup, it's not going to run here without being thoroughly backgrounded. Rand Paul et al are largely full of shit, but Fauci is a piece of work himself.

July 09, 2026

Platner: Deflated, not just deflating like a cheap balloon, with my own callout of Klip

Riffing off my Substack version of this, earlier and shorter, Platner is now deflated, past tense. He has "suspended" his campaign. Two years ago, I had people attack me when I said Brainworm Bobby was quitting the presidential race after he "suspended" his campaign. We all know what it means, so STFU Brainworm MAGAt MA-HAt asshats.  (I know other sites have reported he has "ended" his campaign or is "resigning" as the Democratic nominee, but this one is better.)

Most politically minded people have probably already heard the claims that Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner raped a woman he was dating. I saw that via Payday Report, on my blogroll. There, Mike Elk added that Hasan Piker found it believable.

Meanwhile, some people are claiming, like this Rhombus Ticks, that it's all a setup. Unfortunately, I was replying to his reply to someone else, so I can't counterblock him. Damn, Substack needs to fix that. Other readers of this? Please block him. (He claimed this was all a nothingburger compared to Epstein, was a conspiracy, and also that the self-implosion/takedown of Al Franken was also a conspiracy.)

This is no surprise.

The Platner engine was leaking oil at the start of the week. A Maine teevee station notes as part of its story that he had already postponed some campaign events. Also per that? Jenny Racicot did not come out of nowhere. She first spoke to the NYT five days before the Maine primary, without mentioning details.

This Substack, a piece at All Your Days, says he talked to staff Monday night and, by saying he's in control of who replaces him, indicates he's planning on resigning — for the right replacement. 

So how did we get here? Oppo research done on the cheap, per All Your Days:

Here’s how the disaster unfolded. The Wall Street Journal reports that Dan Moraff, the progressive strategist who recruited Platner and ran his launch, asked a Democratic research firm for an expedited, cut-rate review of the candidate rather than the thorough background check that has become standard in major Senate races. That would have been a weeks-long process costing roughly $20,000. Instead, New York-based Northside Research delivered a brief risk-assessment memo in three days for $6,250, federal disclosures show, in place of the usual research book that should have run hundreds of pages. 
Northside’s memo flagged some of Platner’s problematic Reddit posts, but it missed the full trove. It also missed the death’s-head tattoo—the one resembling the Nazi SS Totenkopf—that Platner wore for 18 years before learning, he says, what it evoked. It similarly missed the sexually explicit texts he sent to several women after his 2023 marriage—texts his own wife discovered and reported to his aides, who decided they were a private matter.

Ooops. 

I suspect that Dan Moraff will be toxic from here on out, as will Northside Research. According to search-engine grabs of this paywall-protected WSJ piece, Moraff said he wanted to blow up how Democrats do campaigns. Well, he blew up two things — his reputation and probably Dems' chances of regaining the Senate.

That said, it's not just Moraff doing stupidities, per All Your Days:

In North Carolina, Schumer and the party’s Senate campaign arm reached into the primary and anointed Cal Cunningham, a clean-cut veteran who, the Associated Press noted, was a star recruit of the minority leader himself. Cunningham was straight out of central casting for the Schumer biopic, perhaps, but in October 2020, his sexts to a woman who was not his wife became public. Sound familiar? Nonetheless, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee shoveled millions more into the race. Cunningham lost a must-win state by two points after leading in the polls, as Sabato’s Crystal Ball recounts.

Shock me. There's more there. 

As for Northside? If this is the correct website, the teh suck minimalist design itself speaks volumes. Per a description of the company, the website and head honcho Jonathan Davis on this piece, that has to be it.  A 2023 issue of the Intelligencer has a bit more. Coming next? Finger-pointing, of course.

This guy, meanwhile, answers the Rhombus Ticks nutters, beyond what Elk said.

That said, many others. like Rhombus Ticks, are surely wondering "why now"? (Some, like him, aren't wondering, in reality, they're "just asking questions" about both "why now" and "who is she"?)

It appears the June story was a "marker," if you will. But, with Mills having suspended her campaign, who could pick up that marker? The one real progressive alternative, Amanda LaFlamme, had to run as a write-in after not getting enough signatures. See my coverage here

That said, in writing earlier about the Totenkopf, I mentioned oppo research! And other "progressive" concerns that a leftist non-Democrat would have! Here: 

Obviously, I can't read all his deleted Reddit posts. They were written years later. For someone who claims they were leftist by then, a certain amount of them cut against that grain. And, yes, PTSD is serious and real. But, per the Latin bon mot, "in vino veritas," PTSD doesn't necessarily cause an "alt-persona" to arise. 
This also show that he's a political novice. Experienced candidates running for something as high as a US Senate seat do "oppo research" on themselves to find out in advance what opponents might dig up, and to be prepared in advance. 
I didn't think to check his Wiki much in advance. I'm as troubled by the fact that his family was moneyed enough to send him to an elite prep school like Hotchkiss as anything else, even if he got financial aid. Did he get booted, though? That's not the only high school he attended. The other is also private, originally Catholic but now nonreligious.

Still rings true. (Speaking of, why was his eliteness not called out more? Or, in light of all of the above, did nobody look at why he dropped out of Hotchkiss?)

== 

Addenda to this versus my Substack post Tuesday. 

I'm sure after July 27, there will be more time to answer all of this.  (That is the deadline for Maine Dems getting a replacement, assuming he resigns by July 13.)

Per a Drop Site reporter's Twitter, Platner volunteers want him to resign and have a candidate: Troy Jackson. 

Contra Black Twitter like this guy retweeting this

Yeah, you were stanning for a Black candidate like Kamala Harris the Zionist genocidalist, while I, actually skeptical, rejected Jill Stein as a hypocrite and voted for the Hispanic Communist Claudia de la Cruz.

Or per first guy retweeting this?

Sure, Blacks have a higher degree of skepticism. Where are the Black "Nones," let alone agnostics or atheists? And, Black buy-in to evangelical Christianity explains Black sex on the down low and greater AIDS rates.

If you're going to be tribalist, you're going to get it back. 

Per other thoughts in general, note that I noted months ago, besides the other issues, "Hotchkiss," meaning I didn't totally buy the "working class" narrative. Note per my observance about Amanda LaFlamme and her getting generally shunned by Maine unions that I further didn't buy it. 

Speaking of? I called out Klipp, who had a non-apology for previous support for Platner, which arguably, per a previous post he linked, included support for Platner deliberately not being given a full vetting by Moraff. In a highly competitive primary, you have the money to spend on an additional $20K or whatever for a more thorough vetting.

Here's what I said in restacking him.

Per my own piece, with link to an older Blogger piece, I DID WONDER, long before the Maine primary, if Platner’s team had done in-depth self-oppo research. We of course now know the answer was “no,” and that this was deliberate. Did you wonder about that in the past?

Per this comment near the end of your current piece: 

Ruling out anyone with Reddit post-level flaws bars millions of otherwise decent people from politics. The only people left are the exact kind of squeaky-clean, McKinsey consultant politicians that was the entire point of my piece in the first place.

You’re presenting a twosiderish fake dilemma and at least backdoor endorsing a campaign whose recruiter deliberately did this.

You’re been around this biz yourself at the national level long enough, you know that’s why real self-oppo-research is done. Per my piece, Mainers had options to Platner and Mills, and unfortunately one of them in particular never got traction. Feel free to report about that, and other things, next time.

Ken also boo-hooed about Popehat Ken White's callout of him.

I wrote about that on Substack; see there rather than a repeat here.

I do want to add that it's far more than Popehat kicking Ken in the nads, and others are now kicking him for his smug take on Popehat. Here's a good one; it also calls out Ryan Grim. There are plenty of others.

I think Ken is trying to insist that he was just and only writing about upsetting the Democratic politics as usual applecart. But, the terms and field of debate aren't yours alone to define, Ken.

To put it another way? If you have shit in one hand and New Coke shit in the other, you still have shit in both hands. 

And, Ken, until you admit that, you're still going to be holding shit, and stanning for shit, too often. 

Why didn't you ask how somebody who went to an elite prep school like Hotchkiss got labeled as a workingman populist? For that matter, why didn't you ask if he dropped out, or if he got kicked out? 

Mike Elk on Payday Report HAS, in fact, raised that issue, in his piece about Platner's possible and hoped-for replacement, Troy Jackson:

While many complained that Graham Platner, who hailed from a wealthy family, presented himself as a “working class” guy, the 58-year-old Jackson grew up in poverty in the north of the state and has a history of direct action as a unionized logger.

That said, Mike links to David Dayen at The American Prospect, who notes that the Maine Democrat Party could squeeze Platner supporters in what appears to not allow voters a chance at participating in choosing Platner's replacement. Give the whole thing a read.

Mike also, in another piece, has a callout of Moraff based on personal experience. 

Jeet Heer, with this subhed:

Democratic leaders have rightfully lost credibility. But that’s no excuse for political adventurers to seize the moment and pump up false saviors.

followed by this:

This is even though, during his rapid ascent and equally quick plummet from political stardom, Platner waved more red flags than the track marshals in a hundred auto races. Among the major scandals he endured were: the Nazi tattoo on his chest; six years of employment as a private defense contractor (in other words, as a mercenary) for the firm then known as Blackwater; a history of lurid, misogynist, and generally inflammatory Reddit posts; a recent pattern of sexting other women while married; and allegations of abusive behavior towards women.

Yeah, Blackwater? Should have been immediately disqualifying besides his problems with women. 

 and Katha Pollitt are also weighing in on the bad vetting, as I await Klipp sticking his turtle head out of his shell. 

And it keeps getting worse. Looks like somebody should have vetted Moraff better.

Mike Elk reports that Pittsburgh-area Congresscritter Summer Lee booted him from her 2022 campaign over allegations of sexual harassment against HIM. Maybe that's why he just gave Platner nickel-version vetting. 

And more yet, with a sort-of callout of Bernie Sanders, too:

You GO, Mike. 

While campaign videos distributed by the Sanders campaign described Platner as a working-class oyster farmer, this was far from the truth. Platner’s grandfather, Warren Platner, was a wealthy interior designer and architect who designed the iconic restaurant Windows of the World on top of the World Trade Center and the headquarters of the Ford Foundation. 
His father was a wealthy attorney and his mother owned a high-end restaurant outside of Bar Harbor, Maine. His father gave him the money to buy a house and his mother bought his oysters for her high-end restaurant outside of the tourist haven of Acadia National Park. Platner lived on a $60,000-a-year military pension and by all accounts did not struggle to pay bills.

This is all related to the "Hotchkiss" stuff that caught my attention. Platner WAS and IS NOT a "working class everyday person." 

And? Maroff has now fired back, calling Elk part of the political establishment. What a laugh. (And he did it in the New York Post.)

Will Klip do the same? 

Meanwhile, Brains, with an assist from Ted Rall going down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole, is staking out at least partially the same stance. Shock me. It is interesting to note only 4 comments to and 14 reposts of that Shit, counting mine. Ted not having that much reach any more? Did he ever?

July 08, 2026

Strangeabbott hires the Schatz to give Texas elections the Schitz

Strangeabbott hires nutter Nate Schatzline to somehow try to fuck around with elections and do T-Rump's bidding. That's what it means, Kuff. NOT hiring him to replace Jane Nelson as secretary of state is kind of a tell. Outside of fucking around with elections, as the story notes, he'll be Strange's point man on trying to get the Lege to OK closed primaries. Note that Schatz pushed a bill to that end in 2025 but it never got out of committee, meaning Strange is going to probably have to do a fair bit of strongarming.

Schitz — yeah, let's just go there — is also a 2020 election falser and more.

And, in re that Trib piece, as I said on Kuff's posting of it:

Once again, the Trib tries to erase third parties. I don’t know who the Libertarians might be running or not, but I know the Greens have a practicing Muslim, Shehla Fahzi for comptroller, who promises to trash all anti-BDS language in the Comptroller’s office, a pledge I am unaware of Dem Sarah Eckhardt making. (I’m going in part on an interview the Observer had shortly before primaries, when it never raised that issue with her.)

Shock me. 

Eckhardt? She is sympathetic to pro-Palestinian protestors, but has not made a specific pledge like that. 

July 02, 2026

Texas Progressives

Off the Kuff notes Greg Abbott's pseudo-evolution on data centers, in which even Sid Miller is making him look bad. 

SocraticGadfly talked about self-hating Blacks, Hispanics and Muslims attending the GOP state convention.

Talarico told Texas Democrats in convention the party must stop taking Blacks for granted. Black Democrats agree, beyond Jasmine Crockett's tepid support for him, which will remain tepid through November. That's why people like Kuff need to pump their brakes.

Bernie Sanders hater Dolores Huerta, not the most democratic person in Nevada, told Texas Democrats to "save democracy." See here and here for my take on 2016 and 2020 Nevada primaries.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project posted on Abbott’s likely far-right pick for Texas Secretary of State. With Harris County having a Black Muslim progressive woman as Democratic nominee for County Judge & Texas Republicans being anti-democratic and bigoted, we must be prepared for anything. 

Big John Cornyn makes a tiny break with the GOP establishment, worrying about closed primaries backfiring. 

Texas rabbis rip the Jewish fig leaf off "Judeo-Christian" over the State Board of Ed's proposed list of bibul verses for public school reading. Yeah, there will be lawsuits. 

In something parallel, the Monthly says "Christian nationalists are cheering" for the SBOE's proposed changes to school curricula. 

Contra RRC claims about doing all it can about old well blowouts, Russell Gold talks about "the Dead Sea of Texas," a Pecos County brine lake that's been around 20 years. 

SpaceX: Unsafe workplace.

"'Hunter vs United States': The most important criminal case of the term" is a very good and very important read about Justice Neil Gorsuch's likely thought on expanding the scope of jury trials, and as a sidebar, how, on at least some issues, SCOTUS conservatives don't all fit in one package.

The Texas Signal celebrates Pride in Caldwell County.

Your Local Epidemiologist highlights the great success of the HPV vaccine.

June 29, 2026

A couple of Texas political items of note

First, via Independent Political Report, with link there to original story by Ballot Access News, former Democratic lite gov candidate Michael Collier, trying to get on the ballot this year for the same spot as an independent, is suing the state over the petition signature gathering window, and is now backed by the Forward Party.

Kuff, of course, hates this. He hates it to the point that in his last graf, he pulls out the old left hand of the duopoly line, state-level version, to essentially say that a vote for Collier is "really" a vote for Patrick. I told him he had better not ever say that to my online face.

Also, the Trib piece he links to writes Green Kevin McCormick and Libertarian Anthony Castro out of the election. Shock me. (And, it's useless to get. the Trib, or the Monthly, to ever admit wrongness.)

Second, also via IPR, the Texas Libertarian Party is rejecting AIPAC-funded candidates. Yes, it's highly unlikely that's happening anyway, but still nice to see that for the record. 

June 24, 2026

Self-hating Blacks, Hispanics and Muslims attend Texas GOP convention

This picture should say it all, or nearly so:


Samar Halabi is the lady on left. That's clearly an African-American woman at right, and apparently a Hispanic in back.

And, they are self-hating, the Black and the Hispanic, even if they don't recognize it.
 
The Texas Trib has the details of the Texas Republican state convention. 

It's a version of Martin Niemoller's old poem, augmented by the fact that racist wingnuts HAVE ALREADY come after you in the past, and some, whom the Texas GOP, or at least its biggest donors, have not disavowed, like Nick Fuentes, are trying to come after you again today, along with Mooslims.

But, I included Muslims in the self-hating, did I not?

First, the lady pictured:
Halabi, a teacher, declined to say how she would vote in November, but said that she is a Republican and always votes.
Well, there you go.

And more, from her husband:

Well, there you really go.
Halabi and her husband, Amjad Muhtaseb, were both registered as delegates for the convention. 
Muhtaseb, an engineer and business owner, said Muslims are conservative by nature. 
“We believe in Adam and Eve,” he said. “We don’t believe in this, multiple gender. We don’t drink. We don’t gamble. We are against pornography.” 
They hope to bring more Muslims into the Republican Party.
And this:
When it comes time to vote in the midterms, Tarek Hussein plans to support his party where he feels it’s deserved. 
“I will vote Republican for the good Republican candidate,” he said.
You've been kicked in the teeth, and told things will get worse in two years at the 2028 state convention, but you're back for more.

Yes, it will get worse.

Strangeabbott last year designated the Council on American-Islamic Relations a terrorist group. Muhtaseb and Tarek Hussein, who founded its Houston chapter, were both not just state GOP attendees but delegates.

Here you are on that:
Throughout the week, members of the convention attempted to remove them as delegates. 
Ultimately, the party concluded that even the full convention did not have the power to boot them. However, the convention on Friday updated its rules so that next time it meets in 2028, the Credentials Committee could vote to remove delegates with ties to a terrorist organization.
Have fun coming back in 2028.
 
Let's add in that CAIR national is suing Strangeabbott over the designation. 

Side note: This illustrates to a T the problems with a Westminster first-past-the-post political system when combined with a strong-presidential leadership model, or strong-governor model at the state level. Conservative Muslims have no home in a party rife with bigotry and third parties that might have room have no traction. That said, the American Solidarity Party, an American version of the Catholic-oriented Christian Democrat parties of Western Europe, would welcome conservative Muslim voters, I'm sure.
 
That said, sometimes, you move. Period. As a third-party voter who’s extended that third-party voting past presidential races to governor and senator, and now past that to lower-level races, I know that.
 
None of this is to suggest that every Black and Hispanic Republican is "self-hating." But, every one engaging in open bigotry against some other race, or here, a world religious organization, or elsewhere, against sexual orientation, is "self-hating" in my book. Note that I did not say you had to become Muslim — or teh gay. But, tolerance without open bigotry? Yeah, short of that, you're self-hating. 

June 15, 2026

I'll eat my hat if Texas Dems flip 12 state House seats

They claim they can, per the Trib.

I know why they think that.

One reason is, like 2018, Trump is on the downslope, and it's in a midterm.

So, context? The 2017 House was 95-55. That was cut to 83-67 in 2019. That's probably not a fair comp, as the 95-55 split was incredibly high. So, with Trump actually running for that second term in 2020? 

The House split was unchanged. It then widened 3 in 2023 and 2 more in 2025. 

Also, Trump was not yet that unpopular with Never Trumper Rethuglicans in 2018, too. I can't remember what was behind the big shift and the Trib offers no insight.

As for the other reasons they think they have a shot? 

Kenny Boy Paxton will not be such a lead anchor for the GOP as they think, and Teenybopper Talarico will not be such a boost. It's possible that many Texas Hispanics who flopped to Trump two years ago look at Talarico and stay home. They don't vote Paxton, but they don't vote Talarico either.

The third reason? We'll see if redistricting overreach plays out in the state House as well as US Congress. Might be room around the edges but no more.

Otherwise? If a fragile would-be cease-fire gets extended beyond the 60 days of June 19, if ratified then, gas prices keep going down and Trump keeps looking better that way.

Strangeabbott has partially removed data centers as an electoral issue, though not totally. 

June 12, 2026

Platner wins; DC dishes as Klipp misses

As political junkies all know, political novice and oysterman around town Graham Platner won Maine's Democratic Senate primary Tuesday night.

I offered my thoughts on his Totenkopf tattoo and other matters of his campaign about a month ago. That was before the sexting after marriage came out, and before the newest allegations of some form of abuse came out as well. Early voting in Maine also started about that time, meaning, especially since Democrats generally are more likely to vote early than Rethugs, that Platner didn't have to fully face the music on these issues in the primary.

That leads me to Klippenstein.

Ken used his space on Substack Tuesday to dunk on national Democraps and media punditry types for trying to boost Gov. Janet Mills and her walking dead campaign, while calling out the media punditry for publishing allegations against him as fact.

Ken says:
The New York Times was so desperate to align itself with the Party in Washington that it published allegations that it said it “could not independently corroborate” — something I’ve literally never seen them do before.

Versus something it claimed was corroborated, but wasn’t, like the story claiming Palestinian rapes?

Versus something I don’t think the NYT even tried to corroborate, but just took a “trust us” stance, like Judith Miller on Iraqi “weapons of mass destruction”?

Maybe not in exactly the way it did with Platner, but yeah, the NYT. has done this before, or similar.

As for his chances in the general, Ken is pretty right that Maine is hard to poll in primary races, in part because of ranked choice voting. But, unless there's a "name" third candidate, whether independent, Green or Libertarian, in the general, the RCV issue itself isn't in that much play. And, on the ticket-splitting and him looking at Collins overcoming polling takes to beat Sara Gideon in 2020? That one cuts both ways. Wiki's piece on the Maine 2026 Senate race notes Collins has outperformed other Republicans on the Maine ballot in all previous races.

The miss? Ken has uses this race to bash DC, rather than to talk about Democratic alternatives to both Platner and Mills.

Like Amanda LaFlamme. I only learned about her on Tuesday when I did teh Google to find out what other candidates were in the race. I don't know why she was only a write-in. The Bangor Daily News reported in February that she actually filed in 2025, plenty of time to get the 2,000 signatures necessary. But the first piece says "failed to get." So, did more progressive Dems in Maine deem Platner a lock? Well, he only filed in August 2025, two months after her.

She sounds like she could have been good on multiple issues, but, for whatever reason, got no traction. I'm sure there's something I'm missing, but I don't know what it is, and teh Goggle hasn't really helped me.

Since Platner was and is a flawed candidate, and yet he's the best Maine Dems could present, I'd like to hear more about why LaFlamme failed to gain that traction and less, for now at least, of dunking on Chuck Schumer and national media. 

The Maine Green Independent Party had its state convention May 30, and per Wiki's page on the election, per Ballotpedia, and per the party's book of face and website, sadly appears not to have a candidate. Ballotpedia lists three minor candidates, but they all appear to be Democrats who dropped out of the Doink primary. A sad election in many ways it shall be. 

June 11, 2026

Texas Progressives

Off the Kuff highlights the Texas Railroad Commissioner race as the latest example of Republicans getting even worse.

SocraticGadfly notes that Trump's education voucher tax credit could explode on top of Texas vouchers in January; looking to this November, he thinks data centers are not a big political needle-mover.

Some Texas Lege wingnuts and the "public policy" orgs want to further expand the 2023 "Death Star" bill. Given that this was the model for the abortion law by providing "enforcement" by private lawsuit, some of the push is to let the AG sue.

Related? More than 130 primarily smaller-sized Texas towns have their tax rates frozen over lack of annual audits, and now must play catch-up, with the lessened funding hindering catch-up. 

Israhell even shoots Palestinian babies

Trump AG Todd Blanche faces a June 14 ticking time bomb. (I doubt he'd actually be disbarred in New York, but you never know.) 

Daniel Vaughn calls on barbecue gourmands and smokers alike to remember that Texas barbecue was not based on brisket and doesn't need to be limited to it today.

Chris Hooks says, in hindsight, that impeachment was the best thing to happen to Kenny Boy. 

Dan Crenshaw lets it rip with the Monthly. 

Space City Weather spells out what you need to know for the 2026 hurricane season.

The Texas Signal presents an updated brief history of Pride in Texas.

Law Dork analyzes the appellate court ruling that protects current enlisted transgender service members from discharge.

Texas Public Opinion Research asks some broader questions about current issues.

Franklin Strong explains what's going on with the SBOE's bizarre required reading list, and what you can do to help.