Two studies headlined by World Science shows just how far downhill we have gone on ocean depletion.
First, it takes British trawlers 17 times as much work today to catch an equivalent amount of fish as in the days of sail.
“Over a century of intensive trawl fishing has severely depleted U.K. seas of bottom living fish like halibut, turbot, haddock and plaice,” said Simon Brockington, head of conservation at the U.K.’s Marine Conservation Society and co-author of the study.
And, the same problems are presumed to be true around European fisheries, which is why the latest round of CITES talks' failure to put a cap on bluefin tuna hauls is so disconcerting.
Meanwhile, in the sea, on land, and in the air, world governments have failed to address biodiversity decline.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
Showing posts with label biodiversity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biodiversity. Show all posts
May 09, 2010
Fish depletion and biodiversity loss
Labels:
biodiversity
May 18, 2008
Send Bush the bill for this one too
The planetary loss of biodiversity costs the world $3 trillion per year, according to the European Union and German’s department of the environment.
Why Bush’s bill? To the degree global warming contributes to loss of biodiversity, and to the degree his “be patriotic by spending” mantra contributes to the loss of biodiversity, the bill is his.
It’s just further evidence not only that he’s anti-environmental, but that he is economically clueless.
Why Bush’s bill? To the degree global warming contributes to loss of biodiversity, and to the degree his “be patriotic by spending” mantra contributes to the loss of biodiversity, the bill is his.
It’s just further evidence not only that he’s anti-environmental, but that he is economically clueless.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)