The New York Times story on how China is no longer willing to be a “responsible,” i.e. quiescent “stakeholder” in the U.S. economy got me to wondering.
How much of TARP, etc., is even for domestic consumption? Did Henry Paulson and Tim Geithner bail out their old employer, Goldman Sachs, not so much for Wall Street as for Beijing?
But, the Chinese, like the Saudis 15-20 years ago, at the end of the Reagan-Bush deficits run, are stuck.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
July 28, 2009
TARP – Wall Street vs. China
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment