SocraticGadfly

July 06, 2023

Texas Progressives jump into the middle of summer

A state district judge has ordered DPS to release Uvalde shooting records. While DPS head and Strangeabbott flunky Steve McCraw didn't comment, contra the mush of the spox that did, this will surely be appealed. It is a good ruling and let's hope it stands on appeal.

Off the Kuff looked at the new laws that are likely to result in lawsuits over various constitutional issues.

SocraticGadfly took a look at the escalating dust-up at TSHA.

Politico gives a long profile of Democratic state legiscritter James Talarico, including the buzz that he's likely to run against Strangeabbott in 2026 AND the scuttlebutt that he had considered taking on Havana Ted next year but decided not to when Colin Allred jumped in.

The Texas Supremes said Greg Abbott's blocking of local COVID masking regs was constitutional. And, of course, this gives ammo to today's Lege continuing to erode local control.

The Trib wonders if, in the wake of the national Supremes gutting affirmative action as part of college admissions, if other states will adopt some version of Texas' Top 10 percent plan. The Trib ignores that his applies to public universities in Texas only, and that, in general, public universities don't have class-based and luck-birth-based legacy admissions. It also admits that Top 10 is itself only a partial, and only a modest, semi-solution.

The Monthly remembers John Goodenough, who, if he did not "perfect" the lithium ion battery, certainly made it good enough to kick off today's electronics world, and above all, hybrid and electric cars, as well as consumer electronics.

Meet the Bushman of the Riverwalk.

What's worse than ROTC or active-duty military recruiting captive kids on on high school campuses? TDCJ doing the same, whoring for prison guards.

Brandon Rottinghaus collects a list of issues the next Mayor of Houston will be facing.

One urban demographics and economy site ranks Dallas 53rd most expensive city in the world. Believable, indeed, with soaring housing prices, the Lege's electric surcharges + disconnected grid, swinging temps to drive electric use, and more.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project posted the Project's weekly report on the pre-trial hearings for the horse hockey Harris County Republican election-denial lawsuits. 

The San Antonio Report reports on the initial construction of a new and long-envisioned bus rapid transit system in that city. 

Michael King ponders the "bookends" of the 88th Legislative session, Bryan Slaton and Ken Paxton. 

Charlotte Clymer catalogs Lance Armstrong's many transgressions.

Independent Political Report is often good, though its third-party reporting is massively Libertarian. That said, George Phillies appears to have jumped into the deep end of an empty pool with his recent First Amendment fear-mongering.

Corey Robin claims 303 Creative was NOT about religion. Oh, in a technical sense, he's right. The plaintiff (besides having a fake basis for the suit) cited Freeze Peach, but it was ultimately free speech in the service of religious issues. Wiki gets that right, Corey.

Smoke on the US East Coast from Canadian wildfires, mainly in Quebec, will probably last until the end of summer.

Reason 1,074 I'm not a Dem/am not voting for Joe Biden? Warmonger Joe wants to name convicted felon and Henry Kissinger Jr. level neocon Elliott Abrams to an inside-baseball diplomacy committee.

Thomas Knapp, who has left me semi-hot and definitely cold in the past, is running for prez as an "independent." Unless he's repudiated his Boston Tea Party Veep run, what he's really running as in as a Ron Paul-tard. Beyond being an idiot on "fiat money," by being radically anti-abortion and other things, Paul was and is not an actual L/libertarian. And, per the announcment, Knapp also worked for the campaign of the late, not-so-great, drive without a license Michael Badnarik.

July 05, 2023

The unbelievable daftness of Corey Robin (and James Surowiecki)

And, yes, I do love bad pun headlines!

For whatever reason, Corey Robin claims 303 Creative was NOT about religion. Oh, in a technical sense, he's right. The plaintiff (besides having a fake basis for the suit) cited Freeze Peach, but it was ultimately free speech in the service of religious issues. Wiki gets that right, Corey. And you apparently don't read analysis of past or present Supreme Court decisions. Shit, your own piece has Smith saying she didn't BELIEVE in gay marriage. In a quote-tweeting, Robin stands by his statement. I referenced the immediately above, plus the Hobby Lobby angle, in a reply.

Robin, in a later quote-tweet, chides me for not having read the 303 Creative ruling. Maybe I didn't read every word, but I did read Sotomayor's dissent, per my original blogging on this, where she nails it.

In a dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote: “Today, the Court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class.” She was joined by the court’s two other liberals, Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Sotomayor said that the decision’s logic “cannot be limited to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.” A website designer could refuse to create a wedding website for an interracial couple, a stationer could refuse to sell a birth announcement for a disabled couple, and a large retail store could limit its portrait services to “traditional” families, she wrote.

Nothing about Freeze Speech there, not as the "ultimate cause." So, here's MY quote-tweeting Robin. (I added the Sotomayor as D in a second threaded Tweet):

What else is there to say? Well, let's start with quoting the AP piece from whence Sotomayor's dissent, the link above the pull quote up top:

The decision suggests that artists, photographers, videographers and writers are among those who can refuse to offer what the court called expressive services if doing so would run contrary to their beliefs.

The TNR story speaks for itself. If you can't believe that is strong circumstantial evidence for this ultimately being seen as a religious rights case, Corey, dunno what to say, other than the above plus "Hobby Lobby" and all points in between, per ZZ Top.

Well, yes, I'll cite Amy Howe from Howe on the Court and SCOTUSBlog, writing IN HER LEDE:

The court handed a major victory to business owners who oppose same-sex marriage for religious reasons on Friday.

Ye gads, Corey.

Yes, Gorsuch talked about "speech" but again, Informal Logic 101. But wait, per SCOTUSBlog, let's go back to Sotomayor:

Sotomayor’s 38-page dissent argued that the Constitution “contains no right to refuse service to a disfavored group.” Colorado’s public accommodations law, she contended, only bars business owners from discriminating against members of the public based on (among other things) their sexual orientation. It does not regulate or compel speech at all. If a business owner like Smith “offers [her] goods or services to the public,” Sotomayor suggested, she “remains free under state law to decide what messages to include or not to include.” But what Smith can’t do, Sotomayor stressed, is “offer wedding websites to the public yet refuse those same websites to gay and lesbian couples.”

Again, Corey, you always take winger majority opinions at face value? In his own piece, he actually kind of disses on Sotomayor.

Robin had probably been declining a bit in my opinion for some time. I know the late Leo Lincourt loved him some Corey Robin. That said, Leo was a left-liberal, not a leftist, IMO. (Left-libs, in my US political geography, reject neoliberalism but believe the existing liberal project is certainly capable of reform, rather than needing at least partial rejection. Already in 2018, trying to reduce "socialism" to "freedom," he raised my eyebrows.

His "The Enigma of Clarence Thomas," while good, was not blindingly good; it got four stars from me (expanded version of Goodreads review). See the end for why. "The Reactive Mind" got five, but it's more a 4.5. Per this blog post, based on part on the book, with more hindsight, the idea of American political cycles is either now broken or else in the political science version of a frozen war. I still wouldn't call Trump a full fascist, but after Jan. 6, semi-fascist, or faux fascist, or fascist on the cheap? Yeah, that I would. I don't know, and don't really care a lot, if Robin's thought has emerged.

And, I forgot that a full decade ago, Robin came off as a semi-apologist for Thomas Jefferson. I also note that Robin way back then claimed I had misread him. This is "fool me once ... fool me twice" territory, Corey. I didn't misread you. Nor did I misread your stanning for Dear Leader. (Both that, and the Jefferson, were while Leo was still alive; not sure what he said about either.)

And, on the Jefferson, I referenced that to James Surowiecki when he butted in on the Twitter convo. Of course, he's a neolib at the Atlantic, so he's going to say that. He's as stupid and literalist as Robin. He's also an elitist from the neolib Eastern Establishment, modern version; you are, if you go to Choate, chud. You're also muted.

After THAT, Sunday night, I picked up another buttinski, jumping on Surowiecki's tweets after I muted him. I told Laurie McKenna, in my first comment, about Wiki, SCOTUSBlog, Sotomayor, and then to backread and not comment again until she'd done so.

Oh, elitist Surowiecki and academic Robin? If I'm not high-enough profile for you, Ronald Brownstein, referencing Sotomayor's dissent, says "religious beliefs."

July 04, 2023

Texas heat and a "hotter than a firecracker" future

At least up here in North Tex-ass, it is NOT hotter than a firecracker on the Fourth, thanks to overcast weather and pop-up showers over the past weekend.

But, it was last week, and the state is expected to be hotter than average for the rest of the summer. (Don't forget that the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration do NOT use overall historical averages for their "average temperature" on a date; it's just the average of the last 30 years, rolled upward a decade at the start of a new decade, which means the feds are making global warming the new normal.)

As Peter Holley notes, the "new normal" is not the old normal, as shown last week, and semi-legendary Texas grit, just like the "willpower" of Schopenhauer, only goes so far in dealing with this. 

The Observer talks about hospital visits in the recent heat wave. Remember Strangeabbott signing the bill killing local water breaks.

And, it's going to get worse in the future.

Environmental author Jeff Goodell, whom I've read before, and is good, has a new one out, titled straightforwardly, "The Heat Will Get You First," reviewed by the Monthly, Holley in specific. Among other things, Goodell notes, per East and Central Texas vs West Texas and beyond, that it is indeed not just the heat. And, of course, warmer air can hold more humidity. Beyond that, he says climatologists have not ruled out a 125F degree day in Austin in the future.

In the interview, Goodell says he's optimistic, though, noting how growth in renewables has grown. (This ignores, though, as non-Gang Green environmentalists know, that nationally, renewables as a portion of total US energy use have NOT grown that much, and that a fair chunk of that remains hydroelectric from dams that are often older, and that, due to climate change [Hoover and Glen Canyon dams coming immediately to mind] often generate less electricity than 20 years ago due to less of a water "load" behind them.)

Russell Gold talks about the solar power within Texas' renewables' deck of cards. He claims the Lege's war on renewables has so far "failed." He really ought to read Chris Tomlinson before saying such things. Or me. Or others. But, his reporting on energy has often been questionable for years. He also ignores what I said above about renewables as a percentage of portfolio.

And, here's another reason I'm NOT optimistic, but it's at the national level. Neoliberal Joe says he's open to geoengineering. Showing its collective values and mindset, the EU is also looking at it. Geoeingineering could well be Homo sapiens' biggest self-induced clusterfuck this side of causing a global nuclear war. It is hugely neoliberal, it is hugely in the realm of "salvific technologism," as in, thinking that the tech cavalry will always come riding over the hill, a phrase I've not used in a couple of years, and it is hugely a "solutionism" idea, per a word of Yevgeny Morozov.

July 03, 2023

Ukraine freedom update for the Uki-tankies

And, yea, that's a new invention by my, riffing off #BlueAnon in general, let alone #NAFONazis, talking about tankies.

A brief update for you.

UnHerd, the would be post-leftist news site, admits that the vaunted Ukrainian counteroffensive has failed, and adds that most NATO countries have conditioned additional armament shipments on some proof of ... success. Catch 22, eh? The story ignores, or was written too soon for, Warmonger Joe to talk about giving Zelensky cluster bombs. And shut up #BlueAnon Uki-tankies about Russia using them in Afghanistan. We did too (and in Nam long before).

The WaPost (surprisingly) talks about the US spying on UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres. Per my review of "White Malice," that's nothing new. We spied on Dag Hammarskjöld 65 years ago.

==

Update July 4: Both Ukrainian and Russian officials, including Zelensky himself (who obviously hasn't learned about Eisenhower's "plausible deniability") have been trading false flag claims, amplified by the twosider Twitter echo chamber, about how the other side is going to attack the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in SE Ukraine and then blame it on the other.

On Twitter, this was being pushed most by MAGAts, who are as likely to have their wet dream see coitus interruptus over a Zelensky false flag claim not panning out as the Nat-sec Nutsacks and Blue Anon were over the Prigozhin fizzled mutiny.

Now July 6 in Ukraine and Russia, and no false flag by either side. Not sure who was worse on the touting of the various false flag claims, but I tilt BlueAnon.

==

Update, July 10: Per my quote-tweet of Mark Ames, in places with more than two political parties, this is having big fallout. In Germany, the AfD is surging, and taking votes from other parties across the board.

Prigozhin: Will this commissar also vanish? The more credulous precincts of the left never will

This is a reworking plus an expansion to a series of updates on my post a week ago analyzing Western mainstream media and Nat-sec Nutsacks' PR spinning after their would-be triumphalism over Yevgeny Prigozhin was dashed when his mutiny failed. It is also a crystallization of my thoughts about some leftist writers takes on the Russia-Ukraine war, and albeit not cited, even more of such takes scattered about Twitter.

A fair part of it is looking at, per Jeff St. Clair's bon mot of years ago over Julian Assange, "the more credulous precincts of the left." My one addition is that, per motivated reasoning, they're usually willingly credulous.

With that, we start with this old book:

 
The Commissar Vanishes:  The Falsification of Photographs and Art in Stalin's RussiaThe Commissar Vanishes: The Falsification of Photographs and Art in Stalin's Russia by David King
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Excellent book.

After Stalin muscled his way to the to of the Soviet hierarchy, he of course then started muscling Trotsky and his allies aside. Later, he threw away people he had once used, of course.

As part of this, Soviet PR flunkies began "disappearing" people from official photographs. People like commissars of people's affairs, etc.

Hence, the title of the book.

On the flip side, a subtitle could be "Stalin appears."

For various reasons, he was not at a lot of early Revolutionary events in 1917-18. So, same flunkies started cutting him in.

King has "before" and "after" documentary evidence in both cases.

In some cases, this pre-Photoshop photoshopping was easy. In some semi-hard cases, it was done crudely. In others, it was done quite skillfully. As a newspaper editor and nature photographer, while decrying the playing with history, I have to salute the skill.

View all my reviews

And, we now look at those updates, starting with those willingly more credulous precincts.

John Helmer expects Prigozhin's fate will be similar to former Yukos boss Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Unlike Alexander Litvinenko, he did not take a Polonium 210 bullet in the ass, but was stripped of most of his assets before being pushed into exile. If Prig in Belarus is in house arrest, Helmer insinuates that the only way he gets out of that is by accepting similar punishment willingly.

The other biggie is that Helmer insinuates Shoigu and Gerasimov may stick. He also notes that, contra western triumphalism, Shoigu reportedly was IN Rostov, and knew of Prigozhin's plans in advance, at least the broad outline. So, while not fully a "rope enough to hang himself" scenario, it's something to that effect. It sounds conspiratorial, though; why wouldn't Prig be arrested before causing as much trouble as he did? Or, get the Litvinenko treatment?

Since Helmer's claims are based on state and semi-state media, this comes off as possibly being a case of Putin writing himself into the scene, even if he didn't actually know so much in advance, as in, in the wonderful book "The Commissar Vanishes," Stalin's photo retouchers often wrote him into the scene in pictures from 1917-18. Moon of Alabama goes down the same path, claiming that "orders were obviously given for everyone to stand down." Cuing Jeff St. Clair and his "more credulous precincts of the left" bon mot.

That said, since Helmer has a background of conspiratorial thinking, as noted by me here, let's turn it on its head.  Both Khodorkovsky and Prigozhin are half-Jewish. And, Chris Cook of Gorilla Radio, going by his Twitter, with as of the time of typing this, his 10th tweet being a retweet of a claim that Universal Basic Income is going to be enacted by a fake banking crash, engineered by banksters, using "Central Banking Digital Coupons"? Well, since Helmer, per my link just above, talked about the Rothschilds' past conspiring against Russia, this is obviously all a Jewish or half-Jewish plot, isn't it? Oy.

I'm not yet done with Cook, though. Half a dozen tweets below that is a retweet of RFK Jr at his antivaxxer worst, claiming the CIA conducted vaccine-based medical torture. Yes, MKUltra's Subproject 68 existed, but this is reading a LOT into it, and contra Orisanmi Burton at Truthout, and especially contra the artwork, I doubt even the CIA would have administered LSD, the main drug of Subproject 68, with a vaccine needle.

In another retweet, Cook has someone else calling Putin "soft" vs Recep Tayyip Erdogan when he put down the mid-level officers' mutiny in Turkey a few years ago, which inspired the title for this.

I'm also not fully done with Moon of Alabama. I've had previous problems with MoA, too, as with Helmer. See here for my take on his take on Sy Hersh and Nord Stream.

And, final sidebar on MoA's link about Prig? He also talks about the Kramatorsk attack. Just because one mercenary there may have had a sign related to the US 3rd Ranger Battalion this does not mean that any current US military is there. Lots of ex-US soldiers become soldiers of fortune.

Also contra these nutters is the fact that Putin used troops loyal to Chechen boss Ramzan Kadyrov to cut off Wagner, and not conventional military. Had Putin and his General Staff flunkies known about Prig's move in advance, they'd have been better prepared. That said, that piece itself is interesting, on how "tentative" Kadyrov's engagement was and how he, no less and possibly more than Prigozhin, looks out for himself first, Vladimir Putin second.

And, per this piece by UnHerd, I don't know how many of the "more credulous" accept at face value all of Prigozhin's claims that Putin was misled into the war, or at least some of its details, by Shoigu et al.

Finally, Helmer has a new piece, much of it actually looking at Prigozhin's right-hand-man at Wagner and its actual founder, Dmitry Utkin. Putin himself knew about Prig's graft and grift detailed in the piece, of course. And, contra his claims that the "special military operation" had de-Nazification of Ukraine as a major goal, he surely knows about Utkin's SS tattoos that are known to the public, and probably about others not revealed. Interesting that Helmer doesn't comment on that. Also "interesting" is that for a guy who has been reporting from Russia as long as he has, Helmer doesn't refer people to a blog tag for more about Utkin, but rather, his Wikipedia page.

Or, per an Unherd piece, especially for Helmer and others like Eva Karene Bartlett inside Russia, we could talk about Putin's useful idiots. That said, take Justin Ling himself with a grain of salt, or call him a "US-NATO useful idiot." Remember, no twosiderism!

===

For better information on Prigozhin?

An unlocked Radio War Nerd interview with Anatol Lieven has him calling more bullshit on the idea that Putin's Russia is about to collapse. Lieven also notes that Prigozhin seemed frustrated that all his previous videos were just not getting Putin's attention. At the same time, as also discussed in his second-latest piece at Quincy, at the end of May, Lieven notes that a proto-succession crisis may be starting to creep over the horizon. From there, on the podcast, Lieven says, siting the Kursk disaster, that Putin doesn't like to appear to be doing things under pressure. So, if that's the case, how long until Shoigu and Gerasimov get sacked? On the war itself, in April, he said the battlefield was already "frozen," due to a mixture of mines and artillery. He adds that the rich in Kiev act as unaffected by the war as the rich in Moscow. Finally, in his latest piece, contra #BlueAnon in the US, and neocons as well, and their equivalents in other NATO countries, he shows that this war shows the power of draftee infantry — and the need for it — and that NATO countries ignore this at their peril. Lieven concludes with the pressure on Zelensky's political future to not give up one inch. RWN host Mark Ames joked sardonically about a Jewish president and a stab in the back. (I know he was joking; that said, per the above?)

Joe Costello also briefly riffs on the mutiny, noting an exchange he had with Ames. He, like me, picks up on the parallels with America and Blackwater, while noting, indirectly, that we never had Blackwater patrolling the border with Mexico or making an excursion against "narco-terrorists" there. Indeed, this was playing with fire to use Wagner semi-domestically, but, that's part of how Putin was able to launch this as a "special military operation." Thoughts like these by both Costello and Ames also at least indirectly undercut Helmer, Gorilla Radio, MofA and others claiming that Putin had this all in hand, all along. This is why I'm a skeptical leftist.

But, not a skeptical leftist who's born a high degree of animus since the start of the war. And, so?

At Counterpunch Radio, Eric Draitser finally weighs in on the mutiny, but not until June 29, kind of an eternity in this world. Judging by the list of topics, he doesn't sound like he has any new insight, for the wait, and that his old insight probably isn't as good as Radio War Nerd. I mean, a week on, his rhetorical question second bullet point, and the expansion of that in his first 30 seconds, without mentioning the word "mutiny"? Indeed, that word is never used in the entire podcast. Halfway in, about "why it ended so soon," Draitser halfway peddles backdoor bank-shotted Nat-sec Nutsack rumors. He is better with rhetorical-question analysis about what could mean for Wagner in specific and Russia in general in Africa.

Worse? Sy Hersh weighs in with something that has even less new analysis of Russia than Draitser, but with plenty of ax-grinding against Warmonger Joe.

Assuming Helmer et al are at least half full of shit, none of the non-MSM analysis answers me "why" question, and that is, really a two parter: Why didn't Putin see this in advance and thus, why didn't he nip it in the bud earlier?

July 02, 2023

The Fall of the House of Twitter gets dumb and dumber

Smelling Musky further shoots himself in the foot on the current operations, and future viability of, Twitter. Yeah, data scraping plus AI is a problem for the Net in general and social media in particular. But, because the #BlueCheckMorons there are so gonzo already, data scraping + AI has a field ripe for botting Twitter. And, since Musk is going to limit Twitter views if you're not "verified" (not to say "certified," per the old joke) what this means is that the wingnuts with check marks will be even more the targets of scraping and AI tweets off that. Verge has more on the stupidity. (For Twitter’s self-own DDoS [it is that] when it first implemented the view limits, go here.)

Speculation is that this ties back to Musk missing Google cloud storage bill payments in the past. Under this scenario, with the "scraping" being something Musky just made up, he figures fewer people seeing tweets means fewer retweets and new tweets, ergo less data to be stored.

A couple of problems with that?

First, it assumes a level of intelligence in managing Twitter that Musk hasn't shown since before he bought it.

Second, whether that's the cause or not, this move threatens to further cut ad revenue, and failure to think of that WOULD reflect Musk's actual intelligence in running Twitter.

That's not to mention all the other ancillary issues in the ongoing installments of The Fall of the House of Twitter.

==

And, that's setting aside the fact that Twitter, jokes by me and others aside, created a self-inflicted DDoS Saturday, which may well still be happening at the time you read this. (I could use TweetDeck OK, but Twitter itself was out cold.) This post from a site called Waxy has more details, including that Musk-era Twitter has shot itself in the foot before on the rate limiter:

On Bluesky, Twitter’s former head of trust and safety Yoel Roth wrote, “For anyone keeping track, this isn’t even the first time they’ve completely broken the site by bumbling around in the rate limiter. There’s a reason the limiter was one of the most locked down internal tools. Futzing around with rate limits is probably the easiest way to break Twitter.”

And there you go. (As of the time of posting this Sunday, I still couldn't use Twitter itself, but could use TweetDeck. And, showing my power over Musk or something, 5 minutes after posting this to Twitter via TweetDeck, Twitter itself came back for me. Well, sort of. I still can't read Tweets off Twitter notification emails. Or use the search window for names and accounts. Or go to other accounts by URL in the URL window. So, really, the only thing is, as of noon Central Sunday, is that I can post using Twitter as well as TweetDeck.)

==

As for the initial announcement?

First, this is going to be an incentive for non-bot users to create burners and run them through TweetDeck.

Second, this is going to be an incentive for hacks to hack Twitter's API to make themselves look verified.

Third, given the kill-off of Twitter's tech support, odds of either of the above, even the second, being detected aren't that high.

Fourth, is putting a limit on the "verified" (and "certified") wingnuts a violation of Terms of Service? #AskingForAFriend 

Other possible fallout?

Non-"verified" accounts that are high volume users turning off notifications to keep spam-tagging from busting their limits. Other people then using DMs more for those who have it turned on (unless Musk next does something stupid there, too).

Ergo, per the old roulette phrase? Never bet on emerald. 

Ergo No. 2? Per the artist formerly known as Wint, keep blocking those blue check morons. And, it they are earning the dessert, block some more #BlueAnonCheckMorons, too.