After writing about this on Blogger a week ago, with links to two Substack longer pieces and some roundup after that, I threatened to write a Round 2. And, yes, per the header, since Klippenstein said he was dropping stories every day this week, it's not just Pander Bearing, it's Fat Bear Pander Bearing.
Let's dig in with the snark.
"Why you're not allowed to vote for the Michigan populist" is the subhed of a big Oct. 27 Klip Pander Bear about Abdul El-Sayed.
As I snarked:
Sweet! There’s now a law against voting for Abdul El-Sayed. Klippenstein forgot to provide the link to the sekrut NSA file.
Ken, this is getting weak. And, the Pander Bear is getting stronger. There are no sekrut links. Just a quote from his opponent Mike Rogers and a letter to the editor of the Moonie Washington Times from a former Defense Intelligence Agency official wondering if El-Sayed could pass a security check. The fact that somebody from the Nat-Sec Nutsacks™ world is raising this is itself a matter for concern, but Klip then undercuts himself by snarking about forklift skills.
The real issue Ken misses on this one is conservative Muslims still supporting the GOP in spite of this type stupidity, in even more Islamophobic Tex-ass.
Beyond that, my snark is better than yours.
===
It started Oct. 26, when he talked about how three sekrut sources at the DOJ kept saying something about a "doomsday scenario." As I said in restacking? That same day, a federal judge — a TRUMP APPOINTED federal judge — rejected DOJ's attempt to get voter records from red-state Utah. And, this directly ties to Ken name-dropping nutter Harmeet Dhillon, who runs DOJ's Office of Civil Rights as an Assistant AG. In the Utah case, federal district judge David Barlow rejected the idea that the Civil Rights Act of 1960 compels Utah to turn over the files.
Hartmeet Dhillon also lost on Oct. 27, when a grand jury no-billed Cassidy Hutchinson.
And Dhillon et al lost in California Oct. 28.
==
Oct. 28, Ken drops what he later admits is a semi-nothingburger about the National Guard being involved in election monitoring. He says that seven states so far have publicly admitted their national guard being involved. And, here's the data from the last two elections:
2022: 14 states used the Guard: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Washington and West Virginia.
2024: 15 states used the Guard to monitor cybersecurity and assist local authorities. They included Delaware, Illinois, New Mexico and West Virginia, none of which has publicly announced its involvement this year.
Remind me who was president then, Ken?
Add this. As far as the "red" vs "blue" duopoly divide, how many of those states are "blue" states, Ken? More than zero, at a minimum.
Add this from earlier this year, quoting Ken:
And in Colorado back in June, Governor Jared Polis ordered his Colorado National Guard to assist with election cybersecurity.
What initial does Polis, also allegedly a mild libertarian, have after his last name, Ken? There's other govs with his last initial also listed, for this year, as acting that way.
Meanwhile, as I said on restacking his piece on Substack? Apparently none of Klip's sources gave him an advance notice about the MASSIVE leak of ICE-related information, as reported by Wired, Tech Crunch and many others.
==
No post Oct. 29? But we were promised one every day leading up to the election!
==
Oct. 30, Ken talks about Seb Gorka's comment in what he calls a "little-noticed Tuesday interview" about the First Amendment.
“We have that knee-jerk: ‘Oh, First Amendment, don’t do anything’ — but there are things we have to do if there’s a threat to national security that actually comports with the U.S. Constitution.”
Oh, stop the presses!
First, it was little noticed because it was with the E-Pooch Times, which is indeed little noticed even in East Wingnutistan.
Second, the concept is nothing new.
Third, you took a day off and this is the best you could do?
==
Finally, Ken, I don't take a dime of corporate money either. Basically, you tried to jump outside the sandbox of the 80-20 power law for social media, followers and money, and lost.