Now, after a bigger win in Nevada that saw him take an absolute majority in Hispanic voters there and run about even with Biden on black voters, albeit with still a relatively small sample size, it's even more his to lose.
Even 538 admitted this was a possibility last week before the day-of-voting Nevada caucuses.
Meanwhile, #PunyPete is ramping up the #AnybodyButBernie stuff, as is James Carville's cuter younger brother, Joe Lockhart, with him appealing to #MiniMike Bloomberg to get his shit together.
Another winner? Per this piece, ranked choice voting, which was used in the early voting portion of the Nevada caucus.
Yet another winner? Harry Reid. Of course, he combines with the first loser of the night besides #PunyPete and other Dems, and that would be Michael Tracey.
Contra Michael Tracey, who ain't quite Dick Tracey, Harry Reid said quite clearly, just days before in person voting in Nevada, that he was NOT part of any "anti-Sanders camp." He has opposed Medicare for All and said it won't get passed, but the New Yorker reports he has a personal fondness for Sanders. And in July 2016, Reid said Bernie didn't get a fair shake and that Dancing with the Schultz should have resigned earlier as DNC chair.Contra this #FalseNarrative by Tracey, at least for public view, Harry Reid was:— I'll Be Biden Time in South Carolina primary 🚩🌻 (@AFCC_Esq) February 23, 2020
A. Neutral on backing any Dem;
B. Encouraging all Dems to back Bernie if he is winning out.
So, you can believe that fact, or believe:
A. This Ron Paul-tard who
B. Claims Maxine Waters assaulted him https://t.co/yXQEKCySDo
I'd already read the first piece, at Bloomberg, so that's how I knew Tracey was wrong. But, it showed up on the first page of hits when I did a web search, via the sometimes-good, sometimes-awful DuckDuckGo instead of Rainbow Satan. If people think that Reid saying Bernie should not get a nomination if he only has a plurality of delegates DOES put him into an anti-Sanders camp, wrong. He's just reading party rules.
Another loser? John Ralston of chair-throwing fiction writing fame from the 2016 caucuses.
Shock me.I don't know if the "damn" of John Ralston is over Culinary 226 rank & file breaking Bernie, contra .@Culinary226 Neera Tanden loving leadership, or over his making a misforcast, or over his hating Sanders.— I'll Be Biden Time in South Carolina primary 🚩🌻 (@AFCC_Esq) February 23, 2020
In any case, suck it and eat crow John Ralston. #NVCaucus https://t.co/qFGPOOTEy0
Yet another loser?
Assuming David Sanger and his media Peter Principle world represents much of New York Times and other Holy of Holies MSM thinking? #AnybodyButBernie and #AnybodyButTrump are walking hand in hand under the MSM cover of #RussianInterference. Isaac Dovere, with a hack job claiming Sanders was dumb enough and egotistical enough to think of primarying Obama in 2012, is another MSM lackey of this sort. Andrew Stewart has already shot holes in this.
Overall chess match winners and losers?
Bernie is a winner for taking a near-majority in his plurality. He probably is a winner again for Mayor Cheat finishing third to Biden, not second.
Biggest loser? Warren? Or Klobuchar?
Tough to tell.
Klobberin Klobuchar, pandering and all:
Couldn't break 5 percent and was deep in fifth place after her strong New Hampshire finish. Contra Chris Tomlinson and the Chronic's editorial board, I suspect "Minnesota Fake Nice" doesn't play well in general among younger Democrats of color.I thought Elizabeth Warren pandered with her live at home video (very wooden) of having a beer. Klobberin Klobuchar just topped her. https://t.co/094JwAZXfV— I'll Be Biden Time in South Carolina primary 🚩🌻 (@AFCC_Esq) February 23, 2020
Note: All placings are with approximately 50 percent reporting as of near midnight Central time.
Warren was fourth, but a distant fourth. Small consolation that she finished ahead of the Klobberer, who hadn't had much time in Nevada. Seriously, Warren-stanners, it's time for her to look for her exit.
When that happens, it will be "interesting" to see if she:
A. Endorses Sanders;
B. Endorses nobody;
C. Endorses somebody else.
B is certainly the most likely, and not just because of recent bad blood with Bernie. Earlier exiters have, for the most part, endorsed nobody yet, other than hinting at #AnybodyButBernie maybe. But, the language she uses when leaving will be key.
And, yes, she should leave.
And, yes, contra the Super PAC she's now lined up, she's going to have the campaign fundraising stream start drying up pretty quick. Bernie and Status Quo Joe will be 1-2 in South Carolina, one way or the other. Puny Pete's faked endorsements won't boost him above a distant third. They're been called out as fakes too much. Plus, MiniMike needs momentum before Super Tuesday, so he'll try to boost his black voter cred by attacking those fake endorsements, too.
If Puny Pete doesn't break 15 percent in South Carolina, he's in trouble next.
Speaking of Bloomberg? I'm sorry, a Trump Trainer of some sort nutbar enough to retweet Styxexenhammer calls him "Bloomie":
Must be the kinder, gentler, MiniMike turning over a new leaf. Probably like the New Nixon.He can do it quickly with a few million. Bernie's three house expose'... Architectural Digest style- on YouTube or HGTV. Bloomie has to get past the next debate, though.— The Brightest Light (@Dawn48789363) February 23, 2020
Yang, while not endorsing Sanders himself (I don't know that he did when he withdrew) has called for other candidates to drop out lest nobody have a majority at the convention and superdelegates come into play.
No comments:
Post a Comment