For theists, atheists, and philosophers of religion and beyond, the "problem of evil" is at the core of stumbling blocks of western monotheism.
How can a deity be both omnipotent, or all-powerful, AND omnibenevolent, or all-good?
Theistic apologists often appeal to god's inscrutability. In a nutshell, they claim that what appears to be evil now is for our ultimate good, or similar.
Gary Gutting says we need more than an appeal to ignorance, if we don't want to have a blind faith.
But, he misses what apologists also miss.
That such an all-powerful, all-good god, even if he or she must allow local evils, or allow short-term evils for long-term good, could
still explain himself/herself better to sentient created beings, and *has
chosen* not to do so.
That, as I have repeatedly identified it, is the "problem of psychological evil." And, I've yet to see a theistic apologist adequately answer it.
No comments:
Post a Comment