Oh, Tom Wolfe is right about one thing — in terms of rocketry, NASA was more ready to go to Mars as a piggyback on Apollo than today.
But, Wolfe is either woefully ignorant of, or deliberately overlooking of, how much we’ve discovered about the intensity of interplanetary radiation between then and now. (Shockingly, Stephen Hawking is, too.)
If we had sent men to Mars 35 years ago, with Apollo-level radiation protection, who knows what would have happened?
Also, we were clueless about the psychological issues.
Finally, NASA scientists knew post-landing “sterility” provisions for Apollo crews were woefully inadequate if the Moon had a actually had any life. That said, we are pretty sure Mars h as no bacteria, but, what if it has dormant virus-type life? Even today, we might not be able to fully protect against that being brought back to Earth.
At least Wolfe isn’t as triumphalist as someone like Krauthammer.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
July 19, 2009
Post-Apollo 11, Tom Wolfe rues no 1970s Mars shot
Labels:
Apollo 11 anniversary,
manned space travel,
NASA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment