And, by undercover, I mean for one country not named the United States and not part of any Cold War 2.0 animus. Three guesses and the first two don't count.
This Kelly Board (Foust) attacked Drop Site News for its noting that a US federal judge had suspending US sanctions against UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese.
She said, in her response, that "she's still under lawsuit, a fraud and a liar." I in turn called Board a fraud and a liar.
The reality is that Albanese, who is NOT American, or British, and don't forget that constitutional jurisprudence in Italy is not the same as in Anglo-American law, said she was a lawyer although she's never taken a bar exam. She does have a law degree.
When this came out last year, Zionist sites like UN Watch (it is) started a lawfare campaign against her. (It is.) I can't prove deliberation, so I won't call her a liar. I definitely don't call her a fraud.
Ms. Whoever (don't know if that's her real name, blue check and all and hold on to that thought, aside) then got snooty. And, like she's not a real defender of "free Palestine," no matter her claims
She replied:
Total liar and support of killing an entire population and their right to exist.
And then the snooty:
Sounds botish and very ignorant in your not requested reply to me.
OK, now.
First the first. You claim to support a free Palestine, but free for WHOM? Yes, you make an occasional callout response to either Bibi's official Shitter or the Israeli foreign ministry's, but it's not that strong. And, you claim Albanese is supporting genocide against Israel. I didn't think to include that in first response back, which was mainly snark about not realizing I needed her permission to respond.
Let's get back to that.
The first pull quote, "support" instead of "supporting" seems a bit off.
Then, to pick up the thread from above? Lots of blue checks don't follow that many people, so under 200 following is not a big deal. But, a blue check on Shitter, on Shitter since 2019, with under 100 followers? Seems a bit off. She also has no posts, but only replies. (She's not a porn bot, which of course all do that.)
She responded to me, May 14, before my full callout May 15 of "free Palestine for WHOM" with this:
Francesca is a fraud and a liar. She has undermined UN rules, lied, and abused power. This lawsuit isn’t about a UN Watch, this is about her facing consequences that have gone unchecked for far too long. This just enables her to sit in front of a jury, finally. And pay her respected part - and then some.
OK, as with the "support" vs "supporting" above, something seems just a bit off on English usage, like the "respected part." This ignores that it's a lie that Albanese has undermined rules or abused power, of course.
Her profile bio also seems just a bit "off," as if she used AI to help fill it out:
I’m like a historian of people, places, and events; including: strong points. It’s not here though.
But, one would thing that an Israeli operative would knock out the English just as well as their operatives speak flawless Arabic in person. So maybe I should think of the Cold War 2.0 angle more. Anyway, a bot calling me "botish" would be hypocritical, assuming she's one herself. Also, as a native English speaker, I'd spell it "bottish."
As for the blue check? After Elmo changed the rules, it doesn't mean that's a "verified" account. And, out of curiosity, I checked. A blue checkmark can hide their checkmark; they can't hide tweets, though. A person who's not a porn bot, but has been on Twitter nearly seven years and only replies, never posts for themselves is some kind of nefarious person.
That said, I googled her "@" as well as her Twitter handle. The third response on very slim returns was this TWStalker account for a Knesset member's page, one who tweets entirely in Hebrew. Replies aren't shown unless you click on individual posts. She is not a follower or followed, though.
THAT then said, would Mossad or another Israeli intelligence agency maybe get a developing world Zionist, emigrated to the US, to post this? Or have an Israeli deliberately slightly mangle stuff? Remember that, before the emigration of Russian Jews, they would have learned these tricks from both the Tsarist Okhrana (though those would all be dead) and various Soviet intelligence agencies.
I've spent enough time on that; I'm not going down the Jessica Wildfire rabbit hole.
No comments:
Post a Comment