Gov. Strangeabbott has, of course, already declared for re-election.
Part of me wonders if he made this official announcement this early was to scare off Danny Goeb from considering a maverick move from Lite Guv to Guv. And no, that wouldn't have surprised me in the least if that were on Danny Boy's mind. (State political analyst Harold Cook agrees on that.)
Few new thoughts via Brains, in two separate posts.
In the first, he speculates about Speaker of the House Joe Straus running for guv as an independent.
Interesting indeed. And, given the flap over the bathroom bill, Texas big biz would pony up campaign cash, and Abbott threats of enemy-listing would be futile.
Two questions — would he consider it and could he win?
The "consider" issue is predicated in part on him possibly being burned out on resisting the Tea Party wingnuts during his five terns as speaker, and while conscientious — which his "no suicides" comment to Goeb about the bathroom bill indicates he is — finally getting tired.
That said he could run and have a non-Mucus (Michael Q. Sullivan) replacement discussed with other Straus Republicans in the House plus Democrats.
The could he win?
Hoo boy. That big biz cash would have to pony up for a GOTV drive of massive proportions as well as lots of advertising. However, big biz in Texas with big office space could find him plenty of campaign events to address.
The second post? One Democrat who's in but not in, and one Democrat (for now) who's definitely in.
Let's take the second of those candidates first.
Tom Wakely certainly talks the right talk about what's wrong with today's Texas Democratic Party. Indeed, he talks enough social justice and environmentalism that I'm with Brains — he could run as a Green if he tires of chasing the Dem brass ring.
Brains thinks something like that, created by TDP cold shoulders, if not outright kicks from Gilberto Hinojosa and minions, could well happen. Wouldn't surprise me. Wakely has at least indicated he'd be open to an independent run of his own.
A Green run would be better. But, that's yet more reason for Texas Greens not to opt out of trying to regain ballot access next year.
(Per Brains' comment, I Tweeted Wakely to consider the idea, and cc-ed the Texas Green Party's account.)
The second candidate? Or quasi-candidate? Jeffrey Payne has basically announced that he'll make an announcement. No previous campaign experience, unlike Wakely, who sought Lamar Smith's House seat last year.
He checks the special interest tag as a gay candidate. He checks the rich conservative wing of the Democrats tag as a businessman citing his business experience. Of course, the Dallas Voice once did a boatload of spinning for eventual felon Joey Dauben.
Yet more about Payne here. Hmm. Hinojosa et al might run more scared from his candidacy than from Wakely's.
Update, July 22: We may have a third candidate. Reportedly, Mike Collier, who already announced for Lite Guv, will either move down to comptroller or up to the guv's race to clear space for former state legiscritter Allen Vaught to run for No. 2.
Collier's got the Dem establishment's seal of approval already. If he does move up, Wakely needs to — and probably will — think harder about his options and plans.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
3 comments:
Wakely is Green, but he either doesn't know that he is, doesn't want to be, or doesn't want to be out about it. With the Greens' sorry state and their 'name-is-mud' among Democrats, his bid as an indy and not a Dem probably would be bad news for a Straus bid as an indy. That latter effort requires Democrats to line up single file, full corps (or field army, if you're a WWII kinda guy) behind Straus, with the only defections being a few Berniecrat/Our Revolution types.
Otherwise, we get another Governor 39%.
Totally agree with how you see this potential play, of course.
As I noted on Twitter, contra Tilove, I don't see Straus running for Lite Gov, only the whole enchilada, if he does take that jump.
Also agree on state Greens.
Speaking of, I know you said you would probably have something on the national Greens convo soon. I've already seen the steering committee / minority members explosion on Effbook.
Needless to say, blogging is a target-rich environment, and I haven't felt the need to write about Trump for, like, a week.
By the way, I now understand why Democrats are so hesitant to get behind (sorry about that) Jeffrey Payne. "International Mr. Leather", indeed.
Post a Comment