Do baseball players who have allegedly been roiding even care about the Hall of Fame? Do owners, commissioner Bud Selig and other image-managers care that they may not care?
The trial of Barry Bonds, along with Bud's denialism, shown by not naming Bonds by name in a comment about Bonds' trial, provide a good opening for that, which ESPN writers take on.
Jemele Hill says Bonds, Roger Clemens, Manny Ramirez and others probably didn't care then and don't care now. Money, competitiveness and ego were all factors.
Gene Wojciechowski pictures Bonds getting in after seven years of wait, and dropping a Bonds-ego-infused tirade of an induction speech on the crowd.
But, will he get in, even after a seven-year wait? If Bonds hurt his public image as much as Lester Munson says, maybe he won't.
Meanwhile, Jim Caple visualizes ManRam's HOF induction day, speech AND plaque.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
April 19, 2011
The Bonds trial and the HOF
Labels:
Bonds (Barry),
Clemens (Roger),
MLB,
MLB Hall of Fame,
Ramirez (Manny)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment