Cutting down on red meat can do even more than eating all-local foods to reduce your carbon footprint.
Why?
Well, the story doesn’t go into details, but I’ll tell you why. I don’t know about fish, but I know a chicken can convert about 4 pounds of feed into 1 pound of animal weight gain.
A cow? It takes 8 pounds of feed to do that.
Hogs, while not as good as chickens, are still better than beef, needing about 5-6 pounds of feed to put on a pound of weight gain.
Eggs, of course, come from chickens, not cows, so the same principal applies.
Eating less of all meat, if not at least occasionally going full vegetarian, as I try to do every Saturday, is much better yet.
But, if or when you must eat meat, do chicken (or other poultry) and fish first. Then, if you must have red meat, put pork ahead of beef.
Finally, if you must have been, look for grass-fed beef. It’s healthier for you as well as less environmentally destructive. Or, try bison. (Warning: More and more bison is being grain-fed, at least for its “finishing off.” Look for grass-fed if you can.)
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
May 06, 2008
Those Chick-fil-A cows are right in a way they don’t even know
Labels:
carbon footprint,
Chick-fil-A,
diet
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment