SocraticGadfly

November 15, 2008

LOVE BEAUTY SEX

LOVE BEAUTY SEX





Love is not beauty.
Love is not sex.
Beauty is formed in the eye of a loving beholder.
But itself cannot create love instead of lust.
Love is more than sex, and extends and exists beyond it;
And even better without it at times.





Beauty is not sex.
Beauty is not love.
Many people, at swingers’ parties and clubs
Have engaged in sex when not beautiful, or with those not beautiful
And many beautiful people either cannot or will not
Find or give love.




Sex is not love.
Sex is not beauty.
As John Holmes said, without love
Sex is but mutual masturbation.
And we have plenty of mutual masturbators, as well as solo ones,
In our world.
And sex doesn’t make me, or a partner
Any more beautiful in and of itself.


— Nov. 10, 2008

Quo vadis A-list Democrats?

I’m focusing on Democrats who are elected officials and aren’t likely to be in an Obama cabinet.

Hillary Clinton? I expect her to make a run for Senate Majority Leader at some point, whether 2011 or 2013, I’m not sure. She may consider a 2016 presidential run, but the greater degree to which older women still face ageism is problematic. A 73-year-old Biden wouldn’t be running, that I know. Hard to say who else would be on the presidential horizon then.

My best guesstimate is that she pushes for the Majority Leader slot after getting re-elected to a third Senate term in 2012.

I don’t expect her to be Secretary of State. Obama’s offer may have been like Veep talk, where he said she’d get no shortcuts on her background check; he may also have hinted that Biden would have a strong voice on foreign police

Bill Richardson? SOL to some degree. He’s not going to be Obama’s Secretary of State, I don’t think. I believe he’d be afraid of playing second fiddle to Biden on foreign policy. And, I don’t think Biden necessarily wants him there anyway, even if Obama talked to Big Bill.

Would he take Interior? It’s a step above Energy and the UN in Cabinet pecking order, and he is a Western governor, a traditional consideration. In any case, does he regret not running for Pete Domenici’s Senate seat?

John Edwards, of course, is toast.

Howard Dean? As I’ve said elsewhere, unless either he wants out of the DNC or Obama wants him out to put his own stamp on it, I don’t see him leaving to join the Cabinet for HHS or other things. I think he likes it where he is.

Joe Lieberman, the man who would be Democrat again? Well, unless he can line up enough Verizon-like Senate backers like Chris Dodd, he’s out.

Harry Byrd? Will not run for re-election, now that he’s stepped down from Appropriations. Obviously.

Dianne Feinstein? I expect her to not run for another Senate term, either. Antonio Villaraigosa might be able to overcome his by-then-old affair news to win the Democratic primary. Right now, he’s coy about whether or not he’ll run for governor of California in 2010. I expect a number of Democratic dominos are waiting to see how Feinstein falls, then him. Also, whether or not der Ahhhnold on the GOP side leaves the statehouse for a Senate run could be a factor.

An open letter to President-elect Obama

Ever since President Franklin D. Roosevelt launched a veritable blizzard of New Deal programs quickly after taking office, the idea – or the myth – of a presidential “100 days” has grown and grown.

And, if fancy-pants well-paid columnists at places like the New York Times can offer their “100 days” advice to Barack Obama, well, why can’t I? After all, they put their hands on their keyboards the same way I do.

So, here goes.

First, increase the gas tax by $1 a gallon, phasing that in over five years to not be too hard of a hit.
This kills three birds with one stone.

I’ll look first at the less obvious birds.

As the Minneapolis I-35 bridge collapse of a few years back illustrates, we have a lot of highways across the country in need of major work. The federal highway fund, based on the federal gas tax, is running dry.

Rather than just raising the tax by a few pennies, since it’s on a per-gallon basis, and not on a per-sales-dollar basis, a serious increase would pay for a thorough program of road construction.

More road construction means more work. That, then, in the midst of an apparent recession, would be an economic shot in the arm.

That’s the two less-obvious stones – road repair and economic stimulus.

The obvious one? Or, more obvious from where I sit behind this keyboard?

It would increase fuel conservation.

Frankly, the sharp plunge in oil, and gasoline, prices worries me. Yes, worries me.
I’m afraid that, if it goes on too long, too many people in the country will forget about $4 gasoline of not so long ago, and feel less need to conserve, whether through better driving habits, or through buying SUVs never likely to take a tire tread off concrete or asphalt.

And, even if the cheap gas goes away soon enough, the extra tax would boost conservation even more.

If we don’t need all the money for road-building work, we can use some of it for research on alternatives to today’s gas-powered cars.

Second, be careful about bipartisanship, especially in your cabinet appointments.

If you truly feel the best person for a certain position is a Republican, fine. But, if you’re just trying to appear “bipartisan,” that’s often been a one-way street.

Third, if you’re really about change, please show it. Don’t appoint a bunch of Clinton administration retreads. Especially, don’t name Larry Summers to once again be the Treasury secretary. While you’re at it, don’t name any Goldman Sachs employee, past or present, to head Treasury, the Office of Management and Budget or the Council of Economic Advisors.

In other words, per one of your campaign commercials at the Democratic convention in Denver, show that your vote for the bailout, and Barney Smith’s vote for you, were not votes for Smith Barney.

Fourth, and related to that, don’t be afraid to make mistakes. And, make mistakes out of boldness, not timidity. If “change” is more than just a slogan to get elected, that’s the only way to make mistakes.

Fifth, and related to that, you were elected on the idea you get us out of Iraq. Do more than that. Bring change to our foreign policy. By your cultural heritage – an African father, doing part of your growing up in Indonesia, you present a new American governmental face to the world. You have the opportunity to present a new American attitude as well, beyond both Bush’s more naked imperialism and Clinton’s imperialism lite.

Sixth, work and think outside the box, as you already have done. The recruiting of so many small-dollar campaign contributors was brilliance from a marketing viewpoint; it gave people a sense of ownership. It also, through the ease of online contributions, gave you a massive e-mail database. You have an opportunity to use that as an electronic bully pulpit.

Seventh and last, get more points of view more involved in our country. As a third-party voter for the second presidential election in a row, I can personally attest to that. A small but consistent segment of voters in this country, as well as other intelligent people who have tuned out, know that the two-party duopoly hasn’t often listened to them. Those of us who haven’t tuned out would like a more level political playing field.

Solar panels made 40 percent more efficient

A new silicon coating for solar panels boosts their sunlight absorption from 67 to 96 percent. The new, anti-reflective coating also makes it easier to capture sunlight from all angles, which means solar cells can now be placed on sites that don’t generally face south.

Price? Not expected to add more than 2-4 percent to current solar cell costs, according to the scientific developers of the nanotech coating.

Be good for goodness sake!

And not for godness' sake.



The American Humanist Association has started a secular Christmas campaign.
"Humanists have always understood that you don't need a god to be good,"
said Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association. "So that's the point we're making with this advertising campaign. Morality doesn't come from religion. It's a set of values embraced by individuals and society based on empathy, fairness, and experience."

Indeed, ethics ultimately is an inside job

Army busted Photoshopping four-star’s pic

And, not just any four-star, either, but Photoshopping Ann E. Dunwoody, the Army’s first female four-star.

Why? It’s PR to make her look better in some way, that’s why.

Then, it got busted in a lie, for claiming the editing, which changed the background of the pic, which also hid that it was an old three-star uniform she was in, didn’t alter the picture in any material way.

And, since it’s not the first itime recently the Army has been caught Photoshopping PR pics, the AP is going to stop using DoD PR pics for now.

Read for yourself; from my background as a newspaper editor, this was a HUGE no-no.