SocraticGadfly

May 22, 2007

My favorite columnist, officially spied upon

Ted Rall says it is so.

THIS, my dear Bush-lickers, is why I oppose warrantless domestic wiretapping. If I had a bigger name and circulation, it could have been me, not Ted Rall:
The Republican Party held its 2004 convention at Madison Square Garden in midtown Manhattan, a few miles north of Ground Zero. The 9/11 attacks had occurred less than three years earlier. If you'd been running the New York Police Department, what would have been your top concern? Terrorism. Mine too. Obviously.

The NYPD, however, wasn't worried about Al Qaeda. For them, the real threat to law and order were anti-Bush protesters. Of course, it's a given that demonstrations occur at every party convention. After 9/11, however, First Amendment-protected activism was anathema to our government. Officials sought to suppress all dissent, no matter how peaceful or innocuous. So they spied on celebs scheduled to participate in anti-RNC protests, including the rappers Jay-Z and Sean “P. Diddy” Combs, and on R&B singer Alicia Keys.

And Ted Rall.

According to The New York Times, “hundreds of pages of documents relating to [the NYPD’s] security preparations” released in response to a federal judge’s order show that “undercover officers attended meetings of political groups, posing as sympathizers or fellow activists, and infiltrated chat rooms. Although they identified a few people who talked about disrupting the convention, they also monitored many more people who showed no intention of breaking the law.” The Times identifies me as one of the three “highlights from the police intelligence digests”:

"A November 13, 2003 digest noting the Web site of the editorial cartoonist and activist Ted Rall. 'Activists are talking, some with barely hidden glee, about the possibility of violence', an officer wrote, describing the postings on Mr. Rall’s site.” ...
More baffling, the security “experts” totally missed the point. I didn't call for violence; I suggested avoiding the possibility of mayhem at a time that politics had turned poisonous, by moving the Republican National Convention to another, less liberal city. (The NYPD dossier repeatedly attributes quotes to me that are actually me quoting others, a glaring error that the Times repeats, presumably because the paper doesn't have access to Google.)

My original October 28, 2003 column couldn't have been more clearly opposed to violence. “As a Manhattanite,” I wrote, “I hope that the Republicans will seriously consider moving their convention somewhere else...The risk of convention-related terrorist attacks should be reason enough to not hold it in a city that paid the highest price on 9/11. A revival of 1968, with cops fouling their batons with the blood of young people, wouldn't do anyone — left or right — any good.”

Government agencies began spying on me shortly after 9/11. I have repeatedly suffered service interruptions — loud static, whispered voices, even outages — at the hands of a government whose laughably inept phone-tapping skills match its inability to respond to a hurricane or tornado. Finally, a security official at Verizon confirmed that my telephone had been tapped. “That’s already more than I should have told you,” he explained, requesting anonymity. “Under the Patriot Act we're not allowed to inform our customers about intercepts.”

Eventually I was seeing my local Verizon repair guy, who was repeatedly being summoned to my home to restore service, more often than my best friend. So I was naturally suspicious when I caught an unfamiliar man, no uniform or badge, fiddling with the posts in my building’s phone box. “Who are you and what are you doing?” I demanded. The dude knocked me down and bolted out a door into an alley. Giving chase, I watched him drive off an unmarked white van with U.S. government plates.

Why, why, does this not at all shock me?

And, what I said by way of intro? I wrote against the war staring in the summer of 2002, in print, in my small suburban Dallas newspaper chain of weeklies columns. I wrote against a “Patriot Act” three weeks after 9/11. Were I in New York, with a bigger media footprint, like Rall’s, I don’t doubt the government would have spied on me, too.

May 21, 2007

Another reason to hate Mac OS X — no application memory control

On older versions of the Mac OS, unlike with PCs, you or I the user could allocate the RAM each application used, on a control panel.

I see you can’t do that now, either.

So, just how much did Steve Gates castrate Macs to make them Unix-compatible? And, was it worth it?

Pricing incentives may mask depth of real estate slump

Like an extra half a percent price drop if Washington, D.C. is any indication.

And buyers like it, because it means putting up less cash, which makes subsidy-fueled mortgages lending to more people on the edge of being able to afford them.

March foreclosure news scare

Nationally, foreclosures are up 47 percent from last year and, more scarily, up 7 percent from February.

Why scary?

Many struggling homeowners use income tax refunds to prop up their mortgages in March, so month-to-month foreclosures usually decline.

And, the bloodletting probably still isn’t over.
“I don’t think we’ve hit the bottom of the market yet,” says Rick Sharga, RealtyTrac vice president. “We should see at least one more short-term spike,” as more subprime loans continue to go into default.


Meanwhile, many banks are allowing struggling homeowners to refinance.

The economy of the next 18 months will tell whether this is a sensible move or pounding money down a rathole. My initial vote, though, is for “rathole,” and I’m not alone.
Jason Allnut, vice president of credit loss management with Fannie Mae, says he’s heard of people refinancing time after time and never making a single loan payment. “There’s been an abuse of modifications historically, which just creates bigger losses for the investor,” he says.

Some places, it probably won’t matter. In struggling northeastern Ohio, it could take at least three-four years for a rebound.

And, mortgages resold as investment devices have less flexibility to be renegotiated.

May 20, 2007

Hire me: Let's try this again

Haven't posted this in a couple of weeks, so, let's try again:

I’m looking to relocate from conservative small-town east Texas, to a new place and position where I can better use my skills and experience.

In suburban Dallas, I was named North and East Texas Press Association Journalist of the Year, weekly division, and twice won overall competition sweepstakes from the Texas Press Association, in my circulation class, along with many individual contest category awards, such as design, news writing, editorials.

I am interested in traditional newspaper journalism as well as journalistic and non-journalistic advocacy work and other communications positions. I have more than 10 years of expeience, primarily at weeklies, but also a semiweekly and a five-day daily. Rescue me, my skills and my mindset from small-town journalism.

May 19, 2007

New hope for fuel cell cars?

Hydrogen for auto fuel cells without a tank?

It’s possible, if one highly common metal and one kind of rare one can both be dropped in cost, and engineering comes through.

The highly common metal? It may be in your hand right now if you’re thirsty — aluminum. The kind of rare one? Gallium, the only metal besides mercury to be liquid at some normal conditions, melting at 86F/30C, and also, like water, expanding on freezing.

Anyway, pellets made of an amalgam of the two materials would be used to produce free hydrogen in reactions with water. The main price point concerns would be the cost of gallium, and the cost of reducing the oxidized aluminum back to its pure state.