Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House by Peter Baker
My rating: 2 of 5 stars
Why do I say what I do? Veteran New York Times reporter Peter Baker has too much "mainstreamitis," too much "have-a-beer-itis," in this over-length tome.
Per the first, this book reads exactly like it was written by who it was: not "Peter Baker," but a decade-plus White House correspondent for a major mainstream paper. Take torture, for example. In the index, it links to pages that don't actually use the word, but, euphemisms or softenings.
Per the second? Baker seems to have that stereotypical "guy I'd have a beer with," as it was called in 2000 and again in 2004, man-crush on W.
As a result, other than looking at some details of how Bush wasn't totally Cheney's puppet, and even more details about how, after office, every Bush Administration official, including the Head Cheese and Darth Cheney, who has written a book, or been interviewed for a partisan one, has told at least one lie about one major interaction with other Bushies, there's not much here. On length, it could have been cut 150 pages without much loss.
I was on the 2/3 star border, but, this book is getting too much unworthy praise, so I went down rather than up.
View all my reviews
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
January 28, 2014
'Days of Fire'? Peter Baker's book is barely kindling
Labels:
Bush (George),
Cheney (Dick),
Iraq,
Rice (Condoleezza),
Rumsfeld (Donald),
Tenet (George),
Torture,
torture light
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment