SocraticGadfly

February 18, 2026

Grist says pushing people into climate change actions can backfire — so what next?

Here's the big takeaway, in a piece it wrote about a paper to that end in Nature Sustainability:

It found that climate policies aimed at forcing lifestyle changes — such as bans on driving in urban centers — can backfire by weakening people’s existing pro-environmental values and triggering political backlash, even among those who already care about climate change. The findings suggest that how climate policy is designed may matter as much as how aggressive it is.

So, what next? 

First, note that "can" is not "will." I'm not saying ignore the study's findings and damn the torpedoes. I am saying that mandates can be framed in certain ways.

First, there can a be a push-pull setup, kind of like the "nudge" so beloved of neoliberal behavioral economists. (The last one-third of the piece discusses that.)

Second, there can be non-financial "pulls," like appeals to patriotism or whatever.

That said — and the research in "law-abiding" Germany, not the US — the problem is worse than with COVID lockdowns:

While researchers found a backlash effect, or “cost of control,” in both instances, it was 52 percent greater for climate than COVID policies.

INteresting. 

The last one-third also discusses financial "pushes." Make keeping a climate-unfriendly older heater, or some similar situation, for people who can afford to change on their own, especially, so expensive that, unless they're millionaires determined to cut off their noses to spite the government's face, they'll change.

And, per Grist, the study's authors acknowledge that even in "law-abiding"™ Germany, this isn't 1960:

The authors also emphasize that they aren’t claiming mandates or bans never work — seatbelt laws and smoking restrictions have become commonplace, for instance. But those were enacted in a different era and there was little public dissent about their benefits to personal health.

Times have indeed changed.

To me, the study, or at least how Grist extracts it, misses a possible, though not guaranteed, elephant in the room.

What if a lot of people who say they care about the climate are actually virtue signaling more than anything else, especially when the need for stronger and stronger action becomes more and more urgent? 

This is an idea that's not brand new to my mind by any means. That said, Peter Brannen's new book, "The Story of CO2 is the Story of Everything," which I read last month and which discusses just how dire the situation is and just how urgent the need is for serious, global action, has reinforced that.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not a Greta Thunberg, or the guy out west who basically won't do anything in life. (I exaggerate.) I currently drive a gasoline-only vehicle (but it was cheap and doesn't need to go to the dump), fly the occasional airplane (noting that that flight is a sunk carbon cost), eats some meat (but in the bottom 15th percentile, if not even lower, of Americans) and other things. On the other hand, I've called for carbon taxes for years, even though not that high on the American economic pedestal. 

February 17, 2026

Tex-ass primary 2026: Early voting launch day nuttery

The dreamy Don Huffines is in the polling lead to get the GOP's nod in the Comptroller's race. That's how far right Texas voters are going. Ben Rowan has a piece that's somewhat mocking of all three candidates. When Christi Craddock is your LEAST nutbar ...

From that? This:

There is only one certainty: No matter how conservative an elected official is, there is always someone further to the right of them. Much of the grassroots right wing in Texas believe Abbott—who has signed a near-total abortion ban, a bill letting Texans carry firearms without a permit, and legislation mandating the Ten Commandments be displayed in public school classrooms—is a quisling.

Is your takeaway. 

(I have long called Huffines "dreamy," because married and all, well ... you know ...)

==

Rethuglicans SHOULD nominate Bo French in the Railroad Commission race. He's so nutbar he'd make Wayne (Not A) Christian look sane.

Forrest Wilder has an in-depth profile of French, so nutbar that even Danny Goeb called him out — for antisemitism, the one sin that you can't commit in Texas wingnut circles, unless you're Nick Fuentes and Matt Rinaldi is protecting you. And, two years ago, the Dreamy Don pulled out of an event where he was at.

There's yet more Bo French nuttery in the Gene Wu article at the Monthly.

==

Trump's campaigns steal use of copyrighted songs all the time, so he should STFU when a Rethuglican, unendorsed by him, uses his image in a primary that has a Trump-endorsed candidate as well.  

==

Nationally, Thom Hartmann goes duopoly-sheepdogging. "Shock me."

 

February 16, 2026

Texas environmental news roundup

Does radioactivity from oil waste threaten a school in Johnson County? That's the Observer discussing the issue;

The Barbed Wire has something even more in-depth. As both note, there's also a 2,500-home residential development in the area. And, the whistleblower about the situation, Mike Oldham, has credible medical history about how the radioactivity has affected him from his time in burying that waste.

That story notes that the county is actually investigating, with someone who has relevant background.

The piece also notes that people who know, from another fracking state like Pennsylvania, think HOW the waste got there is fucking nuts. 

Will Hawk Dunlap talk more about radioactivity and oilfield waste between now and election day? (Living in a small county, I'll likely be voting the GOP ballot due to contested local elections; assuming I do, I definitely vote him on the RRC election.) 

Downwinders at Risk are among Texas environmental nonprofits kneecapped by EPA grant cuts

February 13, 2026

A 66-96 PECOTA for the St. Louis Cardinals vs deep denialism by many fans?

When I saw #STLCards trending on Shitter shortly after noon yesterday, then Baseball Prospectus' email came in my inbox shortly after that, I quickly put 2 + 2 together.

And, I think BP did as well, on their PECOTA for the Cards. All of MLB is here

So, I of course posted to Reddit.

Shortly after that, the first big reaction on Shitter that I saw was from Bernie Miklasz. He's far less of a Cards homer than Derrick Goold, so I generally trust his judgment on the Birds. 

His YouTube was linked and here he is:

I think he's mildly overoptimistic, but not totally so.

Cards fans? Yeah, 70 wins is not unlikely. But 75 probably is. And, beyond actual counter-comments with alternative numbers, the fact my post was only at a 60-percent upvote two hours later rate reflects, IMO, the deep denialism mentioned in the header. (It did get to about 70 percent a couple of hours after that.)

Bernie mentioned FanGraphs as the best. I went there. And laughed when I saw:

All told, ZiPS sees St. Louis as, you guessed it, about a .500 team.

To put it bluntly? FanGraphs is full of shit. And so I told one person on Reddit who referenced it.

But? I'm sure there are Cards fans who actually believe that.

Get ready to get crushed. And, you need to be crushed. I've long seen, over the past two or even three seasons, the level of denialism by many Cards fans on Reddit. Many of them said, "Look, we had a winning record in 2024," ignoring the Cards' Pythag being negative. (Speaking of, despite the team winning 78 last year, its Pythag was at 74 wins. The amount of subtraction in trades? At least 6 wins. PECOTA's not off the mark.)

As for the team, the National League and MLB? My active baseball fandom, besides the Cardinals, has been in the decline for a few to several years. The denialism of other Cards fans only hastens that. And, they need to be crushed. I hope the team doesn't even hit the 66-win mark.

February 12, 2026

Shock me that Western states and the feds still don't want to face Colorado River reality (updated)


Or, in specific, Glen Canyon Dam reality. (My Photoshopped version of the dam, above.)

High Country News, actually getting back to its roots in some ways, has a good piece on the dam, the Colorado River, and the status of a new Colorado River Compact. Here's the latest:

Indeed, a state of crisis has been building on the Colorado for decades, even as the parties that claim its water argue over how to divide its rapidly diminishing flows. Lately, things have entered a new and perilous phase. Last Nov. 11 was a long-awaited deadline: Either the states involved — California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming — would have to agree on a new management plan, or else the federal government would impose its own, something none of the parties would welcome. Meanwhile, the 30 tribes that also hold claims to the river have historically been and continue to be excluded from these negotiations. 
That deadline came and went, and instead of acting, the government punted, this time to Feb. 14. Nobody was surprised: Unmet deadlines and empty ultimatums have been business as usual on the river for years. Decades of falling reservoir levels and clear warnings from scientists about global warming and drought have prompted much hand-wringing and some temporary conservation measures, but little in the way of permanent change in how water is used in the Colorado River Basin.

That deadline is, of course, just a couple of days ahead now passed. I semi-guarantee you won't lose any money if you bet that the seven states of the Colorado River Basin do nothing by then and the feds kick the deadline down the road.  (Shock me that the lower basin states want more concessions from the upper basin. That said, contra John Fleck, the current basins division is itself part of the problem.)

After all, in the Biden Administration, BuRec did a head fake about doing anything serious. (There was semi-serious stuff around the edges, and that was that, but it motivated the states to do nothing.) 

In response, Interior says it will move forward with new operating guidelines. Well, those are guidelines, no more, and per Interior head Doug Burgum and his department's press release, they're kicking the can down the road just like Team Biden. (Per the second of the two links above, Biden's DOI jumped over BuRec to pontificate and do nothing.)

“Negotiation efforts have been productive; we have listened to every state’s perspective and have narrowed the discussion by identifying key elements and issues necessary for an agreement. We believe that a fair compromise with shared responsibility remains within reach,” said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum. “I want to thank the governors of the seven Basin States for their constructive engagement and commitment to collaboration. We remain dedicated to working with them and their representatives to identify shared solutions and reduce litigation risk. Additionally, we will continue consultations with Tribal Nations and coordinate with Mexico to ensure we are prepared for Water Year 2027.”

Let's unpack that sack of shit. 

Bottom first.

"Consultations" with tribal nations mean they'll keep getting screwed, especially in Aridzona.

The stuff within the top half of the quote? Nah, not within reach, not without an actual hammer, which Burgum will use no more than Biden's BuRec head, Camille Touton. (As is the case in many departments, Trump has a nominee, Ted Cooke, but no actual commissioner.)

The stuff before "tribal nations"? BS boilerplate. 

That said, as HCN goes on to note, part of the problem is Glen Canyon Dam itself:

The 710-foot-tall dam was designed for a Goldilocks world in which water levels would never be too high or too low, despite the well-known fact that the Colorado is by far the most variable river in North America, prone to prodigious floods and extended droughts. But the Bureau, bursting with Cold War confidence — or hubris — chose to downplay the threat. In the record-breaking El Niño winter of 1983, the Bureau almost lost the dam to overtopping, due to both its mismanagement and its design, because the dam lacks sufficient spillway capacity for big floods. Only sheets of plywood installed across its top and cooler temperatures that slowed the melting of that year’s snowpack saved Glen Canyon Dam.

And yes, it was serious.

Marc Reisner opened his magisterial "Cadillac Desert" with that scene, going into much more detail than HCN's story. 

Of course, Glen Canyon Dam was itself built on a lie, a lie that's inside the visitors' center:

Oops! 

For those who haven't lived out there, there is no good farm land above the surface of Lake Powell, so no irrigation in the immediate area. There are no towns of more than 10,000 in the immediate area, though Utah, pursuing the cancerous idea of growth for growth's sake, continues to talk about pumping water for municipal needs some 250 miles west to St. George.

It has not improved water quality, and has killed fish below the dam.

As for that infrastructure? HCN goes on to note that, already in 2023, it has come close to "minimum power pool."

If Hoover Dam gets that close, the theoretical solution is to open the penstocks at Glen Canyon Dam. For Glen Canyon Dam, Flaming Gorge is further away with less water. There's not much on the main stem of the Colorado, and dams above Black Canyon of the Gunnison would help even less. 

The story notes that is actually above the generators' intake level but that, due to the force of water flow, getting down to that mark would cause cavitation in the dam's penstocks. Some of that happened in 1983 because water had to be released from the dam so fast, and with such a head weight due to the lake being full, that the water pressure caused small boulder size cavitation, if I recall correctly.

HCN's Wade Graham notes the dam has two additional outlets, called river outlet works. But, they're not designed for extended use, and can deteriorate when water levels are low. (I can't recall if they were used in addition to the regular penstocks in 1983.)

That water level is what is known to those of us in the know as "dead pool." But, as Graham notes, that's still 240 feet above the base of the dam. That's 240 feet of fetid, stagnant, algae- and mosquito-breeding water. 

Graham notes that old BuRec head Floyd Dominy, subject of John McPhee's "Encounters with the Archdruid," talked long ago about drilling into the sandstone around the dam with emergency outlet valves.

That's interesting. But, knowing the nature of that sandstone, also discussed by Reisner, if those valves aren't concrete lined, that water migrates. Does any of it "gnaw away" at the base of the dam?

And, the author's explainer on that:

In 1997, the former commissioner sketched on a cocktail napkin how new bypass tunnels could be drilled through the soft sandstone around the dam and outfitted with waterproof valves to control the flow of water and sediment. What it prescribes is treating the patient — the Colorado River, now on life support — with open-heart surgery, a full bypass. Dominy’s napkin, which he signed and gave to my colleague Richard Ingebretsen, the founder of Glen Canyon Institute, is effectively a blueprint for a healthier future for the Colorado River and the people and ecosystems that depend on it.

Needs a caveat. 

It would be healthier than dead pool, but not healthier than much other options. Like not building the damned thing. Or else blowing it out. 

(I'm with the Monkey Wrench Gang!) 

To add to the concern, the Upper Colorado Basin Snowpack index is horribly low.  It's far and away the worst in the past decade and well below the 30-year average. Now, as 2023 shows on that graph, sometimes, middle and late spring snow will bail things out. But, one shouldn't hang their hat on that, and even before the big surge, 2023 was well ahead of this year.

And, the big concern for the long term? The US Southwest is likely to remain in drought for the rest of the century. 

Texas Progressives

SocraticGadfly talked about the difference in coverage — including in the "progressive" world, and including right here in Texas, so no need to look outside the state between anti-ICE protestors and pro-Palestinian protestors

Off the Kuff interviewed three candidates for HD131 - Erik Wilson, Staci Childs, and Lawrence Allen - plus Danny Norris for HD142.

One of the best things about Taylor Rehmet's win was it telling Mercy Culture — who endorsed Leigh Wambsganss — to essentially fuck off.

Haven't gotten a new voter registration card, even though they were due two months ago? Here's why — a mix of redistricting and state software fuck-ups.

Contra Strangeabbott, and now Kenny Boy's suit to try to shut it down (also not mentioned by Kuff, IIRC), CAIR is not a foreign terrorist organization. 

A 2021 state law barring state investment in companies divesting from fossil fuels is unconstitutional. It will have zero effect on state investments, but will have effect indeed on the Comptroller's office chasing after other business investors. 

A new lawsuit wants Camp Mystic shut down, period

And, since fracking has now invaded the Guadalupe River floodplain, albeit more than 100 miles downstream and Tex-ass Rethuglicans (and plenty of Democraps like Beat-0 O'Rourke) are either dismissive of climate change or minimizers, and also since, as the story notes, there is NO state floodplain policy!, it maybe SHOULD be shut down. 

Is the government of China possibly behind all the John Mearsheimer video deepfakes

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project reported on ongoing discussion at Houston City Council regarding proposals to lessen HPD interaction with ICE. There was not much progress, but we very much retain the ability to organize ourselves outside conventional political structures.

The TSTA Blog warns us to be ready for the unleashing of the voucher monster.

David DeMatthews wishes the state would focus on helping children learn how to read rather than dictating to them what they must or must not read.

Egberto Willies catches Marjorie Taylor Greene telling the truth.