No, really! That's what the government claims, per the World Economic Forum.
Yeah, right.
Both Modi's currently ruling BJP AND Congress would be more likely to let Pakistan have Kashmir than for this to become a reality.
(And, as of August 2019, Modi's moved MUCH further away from that reality. The reality of Kashmir as a "giant prison camp" and how India — led by the BJP, but with Congress and allies in acquiescence — got to this point is explained in detail by Arundhati Roy.)
I mean, given that by 2030, India will likely pass China as the world's most populous nation, thanks to Modi having declared a "birthrate war" with Beijing, AND, given that India's been a foot-dragger to this point on even voluntary efforts to help fight global climate change, this would be great.
But, it ain't happening.
There's ZERO charging infrastructure there. But, that's a minor problem.
One-third of rural Indian homes lack electricity, even though just about all the country (theoretically) is wired. Many houses that do have juice don't have it for a full 24 hours a day. It's intermittent and unreliable.
And, by India's current grid, going all-electric could be worse than having more gas-powered cars. Coal makes up nearly 60 percent of its power generation, and a fair amount of that is dirty lignite.
After all, in advance of the Paris Accord talks, the Modi government said India should be lumped with sub-Saharan Africa, not China, on standards. If it was telling the truth, then it knows it can't meet these promises. If it was lying, then it may well be lying now.
And, per that link and my "birthrate war" comment above, if ANYTHING is ANTI-climate change battling, it's deliberately asking your country to increase its birthrate.
To the degree India cleans up its electric generation, and produces more, other demands on it will go well ahead of electric cars.
2 comments:
Likely the villages w/o electricity don't have cars anyway. Pedicabs anyone?
Are pedicures the cure for pedicabs? :)
Post a Comment