Who, you say?
The guy who managed the Miami Marlins to a 15-game improvement from last year, despite losing young hot hurler Jose Fernandez for the majority of the season due to Tommy John surgery and Giancarlo Stanton for the last month or so due to a severe beaning.
By the middle of the season, the Fish were starting to gain signs of respect and respectability, to boot.
Now, I know that it's as rare for this award as for an MVP to go to someone on a sub-.500 team. Right, Andre Dawson? Even though Tony Gwynn, Eric Davis, Tim Raines, Dale Murphy, and Ozzie Smith (among others) were all more deserving by WAR, and the Wiz, certainly, by team finish.
That said, Redmond's case is different. Just his second year with the team.
One drawback? The team finished 1 game below Pythagorean expectation.
Cardinal trolls who want to tout Mike Matheny? Please. His stubbornness with Mark Ellis vs Kolten Wong, and Allen Craig vs Oscar Taveras, says enough. That said, even with that stupidity, the team shockingly was 7 games above Pythag. Which makes me wonder how useful it is as a "WAR for managers" tool, even though I've touted it before.
Contra that, though, and while noting all BBWAA awards are voted on at the end of the regular season and based on regular season performance only, he was a bad manager in the playoffs.
Matt Williams improved the Nats 10 games from last year. But, they were a game below Pythag.
The Brewers under Ron Roenicke improved eight games, and they were two games above Pythag.
Anyway, there are various ways to skin the MOY cat — Pythag and improvement from last year are two of them.
On the former, Donnie Baseball had the L.A. Dollars two games above Pythag.
stylin the classic
’70s Pirates hat.
Frankly, it would be funny as hell to see him get the award.
Unfortunately, BBWAA has shown for years that it has absolutely no sense of humor, and award voting is already done, so this ain't happening.