Yes, his new autobiography is a tell-all in many ways, but Scott still sounds like he’s been knocked around like one of the turncoat Texas House Dems from a few years back:
“I still like and admire President Bush,” McClellan writes. “But he and his advisers confused the propaganda campaign with the high level of candor and honesty so fundamentally needed to build and then sustain public support during a time of war.”
Not only “like” but “admire.”
Scotty does get higher marks for calling the pre-war MSM to account:
“If anything, the national press corps was probably too deferential to the White House and to the administration in regard to the most important decision facing the nation during my years in Washington, the choice over whether to go to war in Iraq.
“The collapse of the administration’s rationales for war, which became apparent months after our invasion, should never have come as such a surprise. … In this case, the ‘liberal media’ didn’t live up to its reputation. If it had, the country would have been better served.”
That said, I will get the book, checked out, that is, as soon as it becomes library-available.
Seriously, though.
You just admitted the man you refer to as “Bush” in the third person, not “the President,” lied us into war, and you still “admire” him?
More here, with video.
No comments:
Post a Comment