SocraticGadfly

July 09, 2026

Platner: Deflated, not just deflating like a cheap balloon, with my own callout of Klip

Riffing off my Substack version of this, earlier and shorter, Platner is now deflated, past tense. He has "suspended" his campaign. Two years ago, I had people attack me when I said Brainworm Bobby was quitting the presidential race after he "suspended" his campaign. We all know what it means, so STFU Brainworm MAGAt MA-HAt asshats.  (I know other sites have reported he has "ended" his campaign or is "resigning" as the Democratic nominee, but this one is better.)

Most politically minded people have probably already heard the claims that Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner raped a woman he was dating. I saw that via Payday Report, on my blogroll. There, Mike Elk added that Hasan Piker found it believable.

Meanwhile, some people are claiming, like this Rhombus Ticks, that it's all a setup. Unfortunately, I was replying to his reply to someone else, so I can't counterblock him. Damn, Substack needs to fix that. Other readers of this? Please block him. (He claimed this was all a nothingburger compared to Epstein, was a conspiracy, and also that the self-implosion/takedown of Al Franken was also a conspiracy.)

This is no surprise.

The Platner engine was leaking oil at the start of the week. A Maine teevee station notes as part of its story that he had already postponed some campaign events. Also per that? Jenny Racicot did not come out of nowhere. She first spoke to the NYT five days before the Maine primary, without mentioning details.

This Substack, a piece at All Your Days, says he talked to staff Monday night and, by saying he's in control of who replaces him, indicates he's planning on resigning — for the right replacement. 

So how did we get here? Oppo research done on the cheap, per All Your Days:

Here’s how the disaster unfolded. The Wall Street Journal reports that Dan Moraff, the progressive strategist who recruited Platner and ran his launch, asked a Democratic research firm for an expedited, cut-rate review of the candidate rather than the thorough background check that has become standard in major Senate races. That would have been a weeks-long process costing roughly $20,000. Instead, New York-based Northside Research delivered a brief risk-assessment memo in three days for $6,250, federal disclosures show, in place of the usual research book that should have run hundreds of pages. 
Northside’s memo flagged some of Platner’s problematic Reddit posts, but it missed the full trove. It also missed the death’s-head tattoo—the one resembling the Nazi SS Totenkopf—that Platner wore for 18 years before learning, he says, what it evoked. It similarly missed the sexually explicit texts he sent to several women after his 2023 marriage—texts his own wife discovered and reported to his aides, who decided they were a private matter.

Ooops. 

I suspect that Dan Moraff will be toxic from here on out, as will Northside Research. According to search-engine grabs of this paywall-protected WSJ piece, Moraff said he wanted to blow up how Democrats do campaigns. Well, he blew up two things — his reputation and probably Dems' chances of regaining the Senate.

That said, it's not just Moraff doing stupidities, per All Your Days:

In North Carolina, Schumer and the party’s Senate campaign arm reached into the primary and anointed Cal Cunningham, a clean-cut veteran who, the Associated Press noted, was a star recruit of the minority leader himself. Cunningham was straight out of central casting for the Schumer biopic, perhaps, but in October 2020, his sexts to a woman who was not his wife became public. Sound familiar? Nonetheless, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee shoveled millions more into the race. Cunningham lost a must-win state by two points after leading in the polls, as Sabato’s Crystal Ball recounts.

Shock me. There's more there. 

As for Northside? If this is the correct website, the teh suck minimalist design itself speaks volumes. Per a description of the company, the website and head honcho Jonathan Davis on this piece, that has to be it.  A 2023 issue of the Intelligencer has a bit more. Coming next? Finger-pointing, of course.

This guy, meanwhile, answers the Rhombus Ticks nutters, beyond what Elk said.

That said, many others. like Rhombus Ticks, are surely wondering "why now"? (Some, like him, aren't wondering, in reality, they're "just asking questions" about both "why now" and "who is she"?)

It appears the June story was a "marker," if you will. But, with Mills having suspended her campaign, who could pick up that marker? The one real progressive alternative, Amanda LaFlamme, had to run as a write-in after not getting enough signatures. See my coverage here

That said, in writing earlier about the Totenkopf, I mentioned oppo research! And other "progressive" concerns that a leftist non-Democrat would have! Here: 

Obviously, I can't read all his deleted Reddit posts. They were written years later. For someone who claims they were leftist by then, a certain amount of them cut against that grain. And, yes, PTSD is serious and real. But, per the Latin bon mot, "in vino veritas," PTSD doesn't necessarily cause an "alt-persona" to arise. 
This also show that he's a political novice. Experienced candidates running for something as high as a US Senate seat do "oppo research" on themselves to find out in advance what opponents might dig up, and to be prepared in advance. 
I didn't think to check his Wiki much in advance. I'm as troubled by the fact that his family was moneyed enough to send him to an elite prep school like Hotchkiss as anything else, even if he got financial aid. Did he get booted, though? That's not the only high school he attended. The other is also private, originally Catholic but now nonreligious.

Still rings true. (Speaking of, why was his eliteness not called out more? Or, in light of all of the above, did nobody look at why he dropped out of Hotchkiss?)

== 

Addenda to this versus my Substack post Tuesday. 

I'm sure after July 27, there will be more time to answer all of this.  (That is the deadline for Maine Dems getting a replacement, assuming he resigns by July 13.)

Per a Drop Site reporter's Twitter, Platner volunteers want him to resign and have a candidate: Troy Jackson. 

Contra Black Twitter like this guy retweeting this

Yeah, you were stanning for a Black candidate like Kamala Harris the Zionist genocidalist, while I, actually skeptical, rejected Jill Stein as a hypocrite and voted for the Hispanic Communist Claudia de la Cruz.

Or per first guy retweeting this?

Sure, Blacks have a higher degree of skepticism. Where are the Black "Nones," let alone agnostics or atheists? And, Black buy-in to evangelical Christianity explains Black sex on the down low and greater AIDS rates.

If you're going to be tribalist, you're going to get it back. 

Per other thoughts in general, note that I noted months ago, besides the other issues, "Hotchkiss," meaning I didn't totally buy the "working class" narrative. Note per my observance about Amanda LaFlamme and her getting generally shunned by Maine unions that I further didn't buy it. 

Speaking of? I called out Klipp, who had a non-apology for previous support for Platner, which arguably, per a previous post he linked, included support for Platner deliberately not being given a full vetting by Moraff. In a highly competitive primary, you have the money to spend on an additional $20K or whatever for a more thorough vetting.

Here's what I said in restacking him.

Per my own piece, with link to an older Blogger piece, I DID WONDER, long before the Maine primary, if Platner’s team had done in-depth self-oppo research. We of course now know the answer was “no,” and that this was deliberate. Did you wonder about that in the past?

Per this comment near the end of your current piece: 

Ruling out anyone with Reddit post-level flaws bars millions of otherwise decent people from politics. The only people left are the exact kind of squeaky-clean, McKinsey consultant politicians that was the entire point of my piece in the first place.

You’re presenting a twosiderish fake dilemma and at least backdoor endorsing a campaign whose recruiter deliberately did this.

You’re been around this biz yourself at the national level long enough, you know that’s why real self-oppo-research is done. Per my piece, Mainers had options to Platner and Mills, and unfortunately one of them in particular never got traction. Feel free to report about that, and other things, next time.

Ken also boo-hooed about Popehat Ken White's callout of him.

I wrote about that on Substack; see there rather than a repeat here.

I do want to add that it's far more than Popehat kicking Ken in the nads, and others are now kicking him for his smug take on Popehat. Here's a good one; it also calls out Ryan Grim. There are plenty of others.

I think Ken is trying to insist that he was just and only writing about upsetting the Democratic politics as usual applecart. But, the terms and field of debate aren't yours alone to define, Ken.

To put it another way? If you have shit in one hand and New Coke shit in the other, you still have shit in both hands. 

And, Ken, until you admit that, you're still going to be holding shit, and stanning for shit, too often. 

Why didn't you ask how somebody who went to an elite prep school like Hotchkiss got labeled as a workingman populist? For that matter, why didn't you ask if he dropped out, or if he got kicked out? 

Texas Progressives talk semiquincentennial and more

Off the Kuff analyzes the NYT poll of the Texas Senate race. 

SocraticGadfly offers critical reviews of a pair of books broadly related to the semiquincentennial — an interesting new take on the formation of the Constitution and a "resistance" book.

Eric Berger of Space City Weather (and Ars Technica) is still hopeful for America

The Trib takes a deep look, including interviewing survivors, one year after the Kerrville-area floods. It's a long read.

The Lege still isn't talking about a bill to require training for county emergency management directors.

Trump lies, and a physical border wall is back on the plate for at least one stretch of the Big Bend area. 

The Observer covers the Texas Democratic convention. This:

The lack of diversity at the top of the ticket, clashes over Israel, and debates over progressivism versus moderation represent a battle for the future of the party that was thinly veiled by constant calls to unity.

Is a biggie. As I told Kuff, and am writing here, one example? Has comptroller candidate Sarah Eckhardt made a specific anti-BDS pledge? The answer? She is sympathetic to pro-Palestinian protestors, but has not made a specific pledge like that. And won't.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project attended a new weekly pro-democracy protest in League City, Galveston County. It’s essential people see others willing to stand openly & confidently for democracy no matter the aggression of the right. 

Steve Vladeck has a roundup of second-tier SCOTUS rulings. 

Alison Cook encourages you to plant a fig tree.  

Bayou City Sludge introduces you to some of the fat cat Republican donors in our fair city.

The Current showcases the party platform differences on data centers.

The Lone Star Project argues every Texas Republican that supports Ken Paxton is as unfit for office as Paxton is.

The Waco Bridge shows how to swim safely in nature. 

Amanda Marcotte suggests Texas Republicans may come to regret mandating Bible studies in the classroom. And I may regret posting anything by Amanda Marcotte the Hillbot. It turns out to be mainly speculation which is more likely wrong than right.

July 08, 2026

Strangeabbott hires the Schatz to give Texas elections the Schitz

Strangeabbott hires nutter Nate Schatzline to somehow try to fuck around with elections and do T-Rump's bidding. That's what it means, Kuff. NOT hiring him to replace Jane Nelson as secretary of state is kind of a tell. Outside of fucking around with elections, as the story notes, he'll be Strange's point man on trying to get the Lege to OK closed primaries. Note that Schatz pushed a bill to that end in 2025 but it never got out of committee, meaning Strange is going to probably have to do a fair bit of strongarming.

Schitz — yeah, let's just go there — is also a 2020 election falser and more.

And, in re that Trib piece, as I said on Kuff's posting of it:

Once again, the Trib tries to erase third parties. I don’t know who the Libertarians might be running or not, but I know the Greens have a practicing Muslim, Shehla Fahzi for comptroller, who promises to trash all anti-BDS language in the Comptroller’s office, a pledge I am unaware of Dem Sarah Eckhardt making. (I’m going in part on an interview the Observer had shortly before primaries, when it never raised that issue with her.)

Shock me. 

Eckhardt? She is sympathetic to pro-Palestinian protestors, but has not made a specific pledge like that. 

TIme for another round of Substack blocks

This follows on my previous one, published in April.

We start with likely racialist if not actual racist, and Zionist fellow traveler, Stetson. He reads both racist Richard Hanania AND a second Substack where Hanania coauthors, and Zionist genocidalist Bari Weiss, along with Jesse Singal of the Harper's letter bullshit. Oh, and Sully, Andrew Sullivan the rac(ial)ist. He also follows at least one COVID contrarian, plus Freddie De Boer and others. Oh, and yes, Hanania is still a rac(ial)ist. Jamelle Bouie has the goods.

Racist, genocidalist, homophobe and more (language like "sandfaggots") Chet S

No More Lies? Rothschild comments, especially with claims the US went bankrupt in 1871 and was refounded as a corporation with Rothschild help? We've gone from anti-Zionism to antisemitism, and into conspiracy theory. Also a COVID denialist. And a climate change denialist. Also, his URL is "No More Lies 1"; gack, is there another? Also also, he has a Jeebus picture as his icon.

Silvia Rousseva? Saw No More Lies as a climate change denial restack by Silvia. Even more of a COVID denialist; follows naturalist fallacian Mike Adams, among others. Calls Charles III "lizard king" and quite possible means it in the Icke sense. Also a Bulgarian nationalist, I guess, who says that Bulgaria joined NATO "under Foreign Minister Solomon Passy (no, this is not a Bulgarian name, in case you’re wondering)." I guess a Rumanian name like Silvia Rousseva, if real, also isn't a Bulgarian name. (It is interesting that Adams seems to loathe MAGAts. Does he loathe MAHAts too?) For right now, he's just muted.

Among those he follows? Don Jeffries. He's a Trump assassination conspiracy theorist, a "ZOG" person, and via his self-published level books on Goodreads, a JFK assassination conspiracy theorist and a COVID conspiracy theorist. (He's blocked there, too.) He's also a flat racist, per this piece. AND also, GACK, a "crisis actor" conspiracy theorist, per this piece.

Another followed? Vigilant Fox. COVID conspiracy theorist, presumably an antivaxxer if they're "MAHA" as well as MAGA. Claims to have been a "healthcare worker" during COVID, which as we anti-COVID conspiracy theorists know, can mean about anything. Even if you're "licensed."

"Dr." Wojak. Quotes are deliberate scare quotes. COVID denialist and even a "hoaxer." Ebola denialist. Tick conspiracy theory promoter. (Don't even bother asking if you haven't heard.) Measles epidemic denialist. 

These above all came directly (Rousseva) or indirectly via this piece at The Dissident. Dood remains good on rounding up stuff tangentially or directly related to Israel, and personally has not crossed THAT line, but he sure attracts a lot of people who do. 

The Truth About Cancer? Rod Dreher-level religious nuttery, combined with pseudomedicine, including touting ivermectin (natch) for cancer. And contrails! And false claims about glyphotate. (Via Mike Adams of course.)

Scott Carney for promoting things like Trump assassination conspiracy theories. And, although she didn't write this one, Nina Burleigh is part of the listed team at that Substack. Also, no dood, Trump is not in any literal sense the (nonexistent) antichrist. Nor did he steal the 2024 election through a device of inventing fake counties. Yes, Carney, you admitted you got p'wned. You didn't admit you're a sucker enough to get p'wned.

Another Dissident post, about Zelensky's state funeral for Nazi and former OUN leader Andriy Melnyk, has led to more blocks.

Via Zionist "Pickles" in his feed I hit Zionist  "JTexaynes," full of Zionist drivel. Pickles comes off as a less-than-fully-odious conservative Zionist.

Binky LaRue: Antisemitic, not anti-Zionist, if he's talking about how ALL the Jews in Israel aren't semites (on a modified version of the Khazar hypothesis, still, most Ashkenazi have some semitic ancestry, and certainly Mizrahi, Sephardi, etc., and also talking about what Henry Ford said about the "Protocols." Later claims the Protocols are true.  Also a conspiracy theorist, claiming Patton was killed by "them" (natch) because he claimed we were fighting the wrong war. Has other "them" notes.

Off him, Tariq Acknickulous, who's antisemitic, anti-anti-Zionist with strawmanning to boot, clueless about why many people join the US military and sounds like "privilege" himself, and more. 

Also off Binky? SRK.

Off SRK? The Dutchess, with a "truth about Hitler" post. And "Freedom Fighter." Avowed National Socialist. Fraktur / Gothic font. "1488" part of name.  Actually reported that one, too. Hertz with funky letters. Another Nazi.

Off the second of two Dissident posts about Larry Johnson claiming Iran already has one or more nukes, pseudo-leftist Tedder 130. Muted first. Now blocked. Between bitching that he hasn't informed himself better in comment to a comment by me (why bitch? get started!) to reading non-leftists like Taibbi, Tracey, and the antisemitic-flirting John Helmer, that's not anti-imperialist in a principled sense, it's a grab bag of shit.

Pickles? Small-grade generic Zionist liar. But, more and more time on social media makes me quicker to pull the block trigger. 

Someone followed by a commenter there, Dude? White Rabbit. Also Nazi with the Gothic font. Runs not just one but two shithole Nazi sites. And, Zyklon Bee (duh) whose home page of activity says "Jews, Jews, Jews." Off that person, blocked NatSocToday and Aryan Revolutionary (who looks awfully dark to be one), Right Winger Austin (also has "1492" in name) for general racism and virulent sexism, off him, the regularly restacked Ben L (with the @ of "peniszone"), off Ben L the guy named Randall Flagg (@ of "reinesblut") off HIM the Pragmatic Prognosticator (who is anything but).  Blocked again directly off Dood? Debarelli, antisemitic, chemtrails. Off her, SiriusRex (antisemitic, Masonic coonspiracy theories and what I'll call volkish ideas about biology) and Die Welt gehört uns (complete with Nazi logo and slogan), Phantom Pain (one of several people with the fake quote from JFK 1939 about Jews in Israel blowing up their own telephone lines as a false flag, and talking about "Rothschilds").

Off Dude, in a different direction? Meryl Nass is a COVID conspiracy theorist, climate change conspiracy theorist and more, connected with Dr. Malone, too, on her website, even nuttier than her Substack. She got her medical license suspended in Maine and has since then engaged in false representation. Of course, I blocked Dude himself.

Rolf Kvalik? JFK assassination conspiracy theorist, of the new Israel did it breed. An 8-part series, 6 of them paywalled, claiming the "new" 2025 document dump was a smoking gun. He goes further and laughably claims someone "most Americans have never heard of," Meyer Lansky, was the fixer in all th is, which of course brings in the Mob.

Never Trust a Wizard. 9/11 truther and COVID denialist. I had subscribed to him without realizing all that. 

David Carroll? Zionist trying to reverse troll. 

==

On something else? I'll block Kevin Levin as soon as I can block him after his immediate block or autoblock of me for having the temerity to mention Lincoln and colonization on his Civil War History site. (The subject is never discussed by him.)

July 07, 2026

San Marcos says "no" to data centers; what's next?

San Marcos is Texas' first incorporated city to essentially ban data centers. Sen. Paul Bettencourt, invoking the Lege's 2023 "death star" law, says this is an illegal moratorium. Others note that reconfiguring zoning laws is not a moratorium. Expect Lege wingnuts to push a new law next year, followed by ignoring the state and US constitution's prohibition on ex post facto laws, and then to go after San Marcos. This will be justified under the idea of the new law simply "clarifying" the 2023 death star bill. The story notes that some smaller cities have already followed a "lite" version of San Marcos' idea.

Then, there are cities that don't have zoning, like Alvin, mentioned in the story, and of course, Helltown. Like unincorporated areas in places like Hood County that considered incorporation to hold off either data centers or crypto-mining sites, maybe this will spark a change of mind.

Or maybe not. That Hood County incorporation election fairly soundly lost last fall. Those who voted it down will continue to bitch, continue to not look in the mirror, and continue to vote for Rethuglicans for the Lege, gov and lite gov. Once again, contra Kuff, this won't be a Democrat wedge issue, in part,

Because ... 

==

Strangeabbott has called for a ban on data centers in rural areas. Treat this as a worried midterms election stunt/pledge until proven otherwise. 

Pro Publica offers up a trio of climate change stories that speak truth

First, carbon capture doesn't work, which I have long known, but needs to be told again and again and again, versus the lies of Big Oil and the companion lies of Big Neoliberal Government. 

Pro Publica has a great piece. It notes that projections for how much carbon capture and storage can do have increased even as the world fiddles while the planet burns more and more, and we get more and more behind the curve of serious action.

THIS:

Right now, globally, we’re permanently burying less CO2 than a single large power plant can emit in a year.

Is the bottom line. 

That's followed by the lies of Big Oil and Big Neoliberal International Government being exposed:

Some experts point to the CO2 that gets pumped into the ground to help extract oil as proof CCS works. But that process, called enhanced oil recovery, isn’t designed to function the same way and isn’t monitored as stringently. 
Global leaders are betting on carbon capture working now more than ever. 
The models used in the latest United Nations assessment presume the technology succeeds. 
IEA representatives and U.N. modelers say their projections reflect what the world has to do to achieve its goals of averting extreme warming.

There you are. 

The story then crunches the math.

On carbon-capturing plants? We'd have to plant THREE Texases or a bit more; or one Mexico, which is that same size. You see that happening? 

Plus, we'd need to be building countless injection sites — after doing proper geological study to determine each one works — AND monitoring all of them. You see that happening? 

And the price tag:

[B]y 2050, the world could be spending half a trillion dollars — more than China’s military budget, and 10 times more than the U.N.’s humanitarian and development aid budget — each year.

To coin a phrase: You see that happening? 

Related? Pro Publica does a deeper dive of how Big Oil, and specifically BP (stands for "Bullshitting about Petroleum") specifically bought off Princeton scientists in its "Wedges" study 22 years ago, and bought them off on ... carbon capture.

Yes, bought them off:

While its chief executive, John Browne, was rebranding his company as Beyond Petroleum, BP sought out researchers who were already thinking about how to address climate change without replacing fossil fuels. The company found them at Princeton University, where it set about amplifying their work by donating $15 million to start the Carbon Mitigation Initiative. The research program was framed around finding solutions to climate change while keeping fossil fuels in play, focusing heavily on carbon capture.

What else is there to say? 

Maybe this:

BP executives were deeply involved throughout the paper’s creation, according to an investigation by ProPublica and Drilled. [Robert] Socolow and [Stephen] Pacala, the authors of “Wedges” and the new center’s co-directors, not only discussed ideas with the company but, in a departure from academic norms, passed drafts back and forth and welcomed extensive feedback. 
Like a book publisher shaping a clunky early draft into a bestseller, an executive at the company suggested the scientists punch up the language, which they did. Browne himself suggested wording that became a part of the title. Together they helped make wonky scientific ideas more digestible for popular consumption. BP even tried — unsuccessfully — to revise a version of it. 
“Chaps, I have had a go at rewriting the paper,” Browne’s climate adviser wrote the researchers at one point.

THERE's the smoking gun. 

The two scientists of course deny anything nefarious:

Socolow and Pacala say they were sincere in their intent to solve climate change in the best way they believed possible, at a time when it was not obvious that wind and solar would succeed the way they have today. The researchers say BP had no control over the scientific content of the paper. They rejected the view that technologies didn’t exist to start solving climate change immediately and hoped carbon capture offered, as Pacala said, a way to make fossil fuels “climate safe.”

OK, well, do I totally believe that? 

Not really. 

Per his Wiki, post-retirement, Socolow has been a big pusher of the "personal carbon footprint." You know who else pushes that? Big Oil. "Guiltwashing" is a form of "greenwashing." 

You know what else Socolow does, per a link on his Wiki? He continues to push carbon capture, and that's as of a 2024 Washington Post op-ed. In other words? He's a liar.

That said, BP wasn't alone, of course. It was simply the most aggressive oil major, in part as the biggest non-American, non-national, oil company. 

That said, not only was BP not alone, Princeton was also not alone.

In the trifecta? As described by Pro Publica in detail in another story,  just like Big Tobacco, is Big Oil buying off scientists to do its bidding.  

This:

Corporate funders sponsored entire centers, paid the salaries of researchers, kept offices on campus and in some cases had veto power over projects.
Companies maintain they are supporting innovation and needed science. Universities say that with safeguards, sponsorship enhances research programs while preserving academic independence. 
Still, the impact of funding constitutes a pattern that Benjamin Franta, an associate professor of climate litigation at University of Oxford, called the “colonization of academia.”

Is just right.