Another shock me here.
From one of the New York Times' "Room for Debate" set of mini-columns on a subject, we get one that doesn't really even deserve such space, namely the wingnut conspiracy theories over compact fluorescent lights and the GOP Congressional wingnuts' attempt ot roll back the mandated phase-out of current incandescent bulbs.
And, gives in doubly. One writer is from Cato, and another from the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
Leave it to pseudo-free market rationalist Cato to compare apples and oranges with European and American energy costs without talking about hidden American costs.
Ditto for someone from the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
And, the Times will either be stupid enough or arrogant enough to put this behind the metered paywall.
Update: Ron Brownstein at National Journal agrees about hidden energy costs.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
March 18, 2011
CFLs, libertarians, and hidden cost denial
Labels:
CFLs,
Internet paywalls,
libertarianism,
New York Times
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment