But, it's more true now.
Well, it's true as far as it goes.
It takes a too-narrowly capitalistic look at "the bottom line."
Let's look at, oh, the Hearst Corporation, owners of the Chronicle. Let's note that the Chronicle recently fired its Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist, Nick Anderson.
If the bottom line is "dollars and cents," then, sure, that helped the bottom line.
If, in the case of media companies, the bottom line is still considered what it (allegedly) was 50 years ago, that hurt the bottom line.
Companies that win those "best to work for" awards usually pay well. They also do other things well for their employees.
And, it's not just media companies, which "produce" a somewhat intangible product. Health care, per the old "doctor's bedside manner," has intangible elements. So does the renowned customer service department of Apple.
I'm not sure how you measure all of that. But, the idea needs to be raised.
(I don't know what Hearst's CEO makes as the company is private.)
==
Chris then
Being both serious and devil's advocate, when I saw another Chron employee retweet that, tagging Chris, the Chronicle's "house" Twitter account and one other, I asked: "Does this include Hearst employees?"
Silence in response would indicate "yes."
Or, per something I just tweeted here in early 2018, if the Chronic is like some of the magazines in the Hearst empire, Chris could write about misuse of interns.
No comments:
Post a Comment