SocraticGadfly: RIP Wilma Mankiller — but no hagiography

April 07, 2010

RIP Wilma Mankiller — but no hagiography

A great activist for both women's and Native American rights has passed away.

That said, even Wilma Mankiller wasn't perfect.

Descendants of Cherokee-owned black slaves remain excluded from tribal rolls, despite many of them having Cherokee blood, analogous to descendants of white-owned black slaves, and also despite many a Cherokee having a dash — or well more than a dash — of white blood.

Unfortunately, Salon's story says nothing about the struggle of the slave descendants for recognition, nor about Mankiller's role in denying them this status.

The story has its complexities, in that the "white father" government in Washington, after forcing the Cherokee to accept that slavery was over (in 1866! the Cherokee remained holdouts!) also tried to push them into accepting the freedmen as part of the tribe. That said, due to the amount of racial commingling already among the Cherokees, why they resisted this already back then, I don't know, other than to say this is yet more evidence that racism is not confined to Caucasians.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

I'm not thrilled with Salon these days, myself, and the article sucked no matter which way you look at it. Chances are, though, that they "overlooked" the issue you mentioned because saying anything negative in an obit would break huge social rules. Controversy or grievances are supposed to be handled separately later on -- or at the post-funeral lunch if nobody liked the person, as was the case for my paternal grandfather.

(Being autistic, I'm not some kind of manners expert -- I just thought it might assuage your irritation at her racism not being mentioned.)

Gadfly said...

Xyzzy... I read Salon for Greenwald above all else. Joan Walsh is OK, sometimes better. Michael Lind is half a notch above that. Gene Lyons can certainly be good; Conason is hit and miss. The lesser writers... eh...