A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
In National Review, AEI scholar Michael Ledeen fires a shotgun blast at Paul, including the old canard that anti-Zionism equates to anti-Semitism. With lies like that, neoconservatives have nobody to blame but themselves.
That article is dated 1993. I assume we'll be seeing another soon though.
Because i haven't read the books in question, it's hard to comment. But it sounds like the author is insisting he didn't mean what he wrote, and/ot it is Dr Paul's fault for not understanding what he meant.
Ledeen is an extreme authoritarian personality, the scariest type to have in positions of power. This piecei s dated 2003, though, it's not recent.
But I like how Ledeen threatens to sue Paul over...what? Saying that "the ends justify the means" comes from Machiavelli? Hardly actionable and obviously true. WTF?
2 comments:
That article is dated 1993. I assume we'll be seeing another soon though.
Because i haven't read the books in question, it's hard to comment. But it sounds like the author is insisting he didn't mean what he wrote, and/ot it is Dr Paul's fault for not understanding what he meant.
Ledeen is an extreme authoritarian personality, the scariest type to have in positions of power. This piecei s dated 2003, though, it's not recent.
But I like how Ledeen threatens to sue Paul over...what? Saying that "the ends justify the means" comes from Machiavelli? Hardly actionable and obviously true. WTF?
Post a Comment