As much as 6 inches of additional rain across the Upper Midwest clearly threatens a reduplication of 1993 flooding.
So how can we talk about 100-year floods, if this is the second such occurrence in 15 years?
We can’t.
To borrow a page from the skeptical empiricism of David Hume, in much of the U.S., we only have complete weather data for a little over a century. Sure, tree rings can take us farther back, and in a general way, tell us about particular years being wet or dry.
But, more specific than that? We don’t have the information.
So, we don’t know if a “100-year flood” is anything close to that.
And, from that, it follows that we have no idea if our levees are built high enough. We have no idea of a “100-year flood plain” actually keeps residential housing out of major floods well enough or not.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
No comments:
Post a Comment