Further typifying what’s wrong with “presidentialism,” President Obama sounds like he will wind up appointing a White House “czar” for just about everything this side of hemorrhoids.
It makes a hash of Cabinet government and Constitutional intentions that the executive be accountable to Congress.
The most notable example is Larry Summers as economic czar. And, should his tax problems trip him up as Health and Human Services secretary, Tom Daschle can just become Obama’s health czar instead.
The inanity began with Bill Simon as Nixon’s energy czar, then took off with drug czars, who ought to be shot like their Romanov namesakes.
Back to the seriousness, though.
Obama’s already appointed several “czars,” in the area of foreign affairs, with specific portfolios, including Holbrooke, Ross and Mitchell. I mean, isn’t Hillary Clinton pretty emasculated/defeminized as Secretary of State?
On economics, what happens when Geithner tries to show independence from his former guru?
And, how much more is Obama’s executive office budget going to be because of this?
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
February 02, 2009
An Obama ‘czar’ for every subject violates spirit of Constitution
Labels:
Obama (Barack),
Obama Administration
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment