Arguing that the current Bush-Cheney regime has been enough a co-presidency, respected historian Wills argues against a surely greater Clinton co-presidency.
Wills, a definite liberal, isn’t arguing against Hillary Clinton’s policies or anything, just the co-presidency idea. Given the fact that Democratic big brass such as Sen. Ted Kennedy are trying at this very moment to get Bill to pipe down, with limited results, it’s a legitimate concern.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
January 26, 2008
Garry Wills: We don’t need a co-presidency
Labels:
co-presidency,
Wills (Garry)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment