It's long been established that we have what could be called "subconscious attentiveness," which can cause things such as certain types of psychological priming through images being presented to people, but too quickly for them to be consciously aware of the images.
It now appears, in the latest in attempts to unravel human consciousness, that this cuts both ways.
But, the story doesn't go as far as it could, both on speculation and on Wittgenstein-like questions on our use of language on these issues.
Perhaps "consciousness," "attentiveness" and "awareness" need more precision in usage in such aspects. Or maybe they need to be redefined to some degree. Or replaced.
Whether language will be crafted to this end remains to be seen.
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
February 18, 2012
Consciousness is not the same as attentiveness
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment