That's what we have at a post last Thursday.
I quote:
They also didn’t report on the Presidential result in the story. That was 49-44 for Trump over Kamala Harris, with 1% for Jill Stein and 0 for independent Cornel West. Given that West is a write-in, and therefore won’t be on the ballot, and there is a Libertarian who will be on the ballot but wasn’t included, this is another result for a non-existent race.
And my response:
And, it's flat out untrue to say that because Cornel West is a write-in, he won't be on the ballot. To put it another way, that's election disinformation. I don't mean that metaphorically; I mean that literally. This is election misinformation at a minimum, disinformation at a maximum.
And, Kuff's been around enough, and in Democrat politics enough, I say "dis" not just "mis."
Beyond that, Kuff knows from a recent Texas Progressives roundup, that I'm voting for Claudia de la Cruz, a write-in, for president. (I also said in comments that I'm also doing one of the write-ins for Senate.)
And, again, this is how people like me take voting more seriously than the duopoly stanners.
Update, Oct. 24: Indeed, and I presume this comes from the state level, because the piece of paper had the Texas Secretary of State's shield on it? At my polling place, a printout from the SoS office lists all the write-in candidates by name.
And? I just tweeted this post, with update, and tagged the Texas Secretary of State's office.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are appreciated, as is at least a modicum of politeness.
Comments are moderated, so yours may not appear immediately.
Due to various forms of spamming, comments with professional websites, not your personal website or blog, may be rejected.