That observation doesn’t mean, necessarily, that scientists
are more prone to cheat than people in other professions. But, has the
temptation to cheat grown?
It’s possible, given the ever-increasing fragmentation and
specialization in the sciences. Look at the Alabama professor a year or so ago
who went far beyond cheating to shooting people on her tenure committee. If not
junior scientists striving for academic tenure, what about others yearning for
grant money?
Let’s face it, there are serious financial incentives to do
stuff like this.
And, it’s not just money and jobs for younger scientists.
What about fame for older ones?
So, repeat after me: “Science is a human endeavor, engaged
in by sometimes-flawed human beings.”
And, per my comment in the comments thread, this NYT Opinionator column explains just what philosophy still has to offer to science.
And, per my comment in the comments thread, this NYT Opinionator column explains just what philosophy still has to offer to science.
Good post. However I completely disagree. I guess I fall into your Gnu Atheist category. Science, and Mathematics should be on the highest pedestal. Violence, and cheating in these subjects isn't because of their intrinsic value. It's because people are driven by their unfulfilled needs to act in unpredictable ways. Science and Math aren't to blame.
ReplyDeleteI didn't say it should not be on a high level.
ReplyDeleteFirst, though, that's relative. I said "not too high."
Second, I'd have it below philosophy.
Third, people who disagree, IMO, may need to immerse themselves in more philosophy. An excellent easy starting point is Massimo Pigliucci, http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com