Pages

March 13, 2009

Not sure how facetious Ted Rall is this week

IF, IF, you’re not being 100 percent facetious in this column, Ted, and just partially facetious instead, I disagree with you on a couple of things:

1. As a newspaper editor myself, my general take is that small town rural papers are the most likely to survive, not a “leaner, meaner, SF Chron” (or Houston Chron, for that matter, since Hearst owns both). I expect the entire McClatchy chain to go belly-up. And, that’s going to further depress wages at alt-weeklies, smaller papers, etc.
The small town papers that are generally more healthy are out in the conservative heartland. Wunderbar.

2. A newly empowered big-paper media, with a more open FOIA, won’t necessarily go after Bush. And, as a writer about “presidentialism” yourself, you know Obama won’t.

Anyway, read for yourself, and make your own facetiousness quotient estimates.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comments are appreciated, as is at least a modicum of politeness.
Comments are moderated, so yours may not appear immediately.
Due to various forms of spamming, comments with professional websites, not your personal website or blog, may be rejected.