My analysis:
Bond No. 1 sounds about right for current needs. Bond No. 2 probably has a bunch of unneeded stuff. We’ll see about bonds 3-6.
And, shouldn’t Superintendent Larry Lewis worry about being a superintendent and not a real estate analyst?
He reportedly said that foreclosures on home were good for the district because they brought in more kids and lease/purchases produce more kids.
Larry, you’re having trouble getting bonds passed as it is and you want more kids? Idiotic idea No. 1.
Second, lease/purchase types are likely to bring in more children on free or reduced lunch, etc. and otherwise burdening the district. Plus, the likely more rapid turnover burdens truancy staff, and other central administration staff needed to track students.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are appreciated, as is at least a modicum of politeness.
Comments are moderated, so yours may not appear immediately.
Due to various forms of spamming, comments with professional websites, not your personal website or blog, may be rejected.