Libby claims he said nothing about where she worked. Miller says Libby said she was with the CIA, but on the analyst side, not the operative side.
Did they not get their different stories straight? Or was this a deliberate agreement to obfuscate?
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
Pages
▼
October 20, 2005
Scooter Libby’s plausible deniability?
As many news stories have reported, in his July 8, 2003 meeting between New York Times reporter stenographer Judith Miller and Vice President Cheney Chief of Staff Scooter Libby, accounts differ on just what Libby said about Valerie Plame.
Libby claims he said nothing about where she worked. Miller says Libby said she was with the CIA, but on the analyst side, not the operative side.
Did they not get their different stories straight? Or was this a deliberate agreement to obfuscate?
Libby claims he said nothing about where she worked. Miller says Libby said she was with the CIA, but on the analyst side, not the operative side.
Did they not get their different stories straight? Or was this a deliberate agreement to obfuscate?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are appreciated, as is at least a modicum of politeness.
Comments are moderated, so yours may not appear immediately.
Due to various forms of spamming, comments with professional websites, not your personal website or blog, may be rejected.