“I believe insofar as the Supreme Court has taken on this role as a policymaker rather than an enforcer of political decisions made by elected representatives of the people, it has led to increasing divisiveness and bitterness of our confirmation fights that is a very current problem this body faces today.”Gee, John, wasn't “Election 2000” a policymaker decision by SCOTUS?
A skeptical leftist's, or post-capitalist's, or eco-socialist's blog, including skepticism about leftism (and related things under other labels), but even more about other issues of politics. Free of duopoly and minor party ties. Also, a skeptical look at Gnu Atheism, religion, social sciences, more.
Note: Labels can help describe people but should never be used to pin them to an anthill.
As seen at Washington Babylon and other fine establishments
Pages
▼
April 06, 2005
So what about Bush v. Gore 2000, Sen. Cornyn?
Texas Sen. John Cornyn said this on the floor of the Senate April 4 as part of his general diatribe about so-called “activist” judges and their failure to respect the so-called “culture of life” as determined by good GOoPer conservatives:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are appreciated, as is at least a modicum of politeness.
Comments are moderated, so yours may not appear immediately.
Due to various forms of spamming, comments with professional websites, not your personal website or blog, may be rejected.