tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7532871.post3303765934171366118..comments2024-03-13T13:29:33.800-05:00Comments on SocraticGadfly: Someone else who "gets it" on not voting Hillary, but voting GreenUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7532871.post-75239301137999440002015-12-26T11:03:21.223-06:002015-12-26T11:03:21.223-06:00"Comparative advantage" puts it well as ..."Comparative advantage" puts it well as part of articulating reasons to vote FOR someone while still voting outside the two-party box.Gadflyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13075757287807731373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7532871.post-54229045647120070222015-12-26T04:16:15.901-06:002015-12-26T04:16:15.901-06:00Votes have consequences. Not necessarily a lesser-...Votes have consequences. Not necessarily a lesser-of-two evils vote; one may wish to consider the effects of any particular candidate on all issues one takes seriously. If more of one's issues benefit from any one candidate over others, that would be the one to vote for. <br /><br />Comparative advantage, as opposed to comparative depression, seems a bit more hopeful, to me. Ed Darrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10056539160596825210noreply@blogger.com