What else can you say about a presidential poll launched by a putatively authoritative and unbiased group, Public Policy Polling, that includes Libertarian Party contender Gary Johnson, who is nowhere near guaranteed to get that nomination, but does NOT include Dr. Jill Stein, who is quite likely to get the Green Party nod?
Biased? Shortsighted? Pushing a "name" envelope, i.e., name dropping by other means? Making pre-judgments about poll-worthiness? A bit of all of the above?
Anyway, if anybody else sees other examples of this, drop me a comment!